What are the results of the Ibrutinib (Ibrutinib) versus R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone)/BR (Bendamustine, Rituximab) trials in Mantle Cell Lymphoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Ibrutinib plus rituximab (ibr-R) is the recommended treatment for previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients, due to its superior progression-free survival and favorable safety profile compared to R-CHOP/R-bendamustine. The ibrutinib regimen consists of ibrutinib 560mg daily plus rituximab (375mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks in cycle 1, then day 1 of cycles 3-8), followed by continuous ibrutinib maintenance until progression 1. This chemotherapy-free approach is particularly beneficial for high-risk patients with high MIPI scores or TP53 mutations, populations that typically respond poorly to conventional chemoimmunotherapy.

Some key points to consider when using ibr-R include:

  • The 4-year PFS rate is 72% versus 54% for the standard chemoimmunotherapy arm 1
  • Ibrutinib is associated with specific adverse events including atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and bleeding, requiring appropriate monitoring 1
  • The ibr-R regimen demonstrated a more favorable safety profile with fewer grade 3-4 adverse events, particularly hematologic toxicities, compared to conventional chemoimmunotherapy 1
  • Testing for MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status is recommended for ibrutinib candidates, as these mutations may impact treatment outcomes 1

Overall, the use of ibr-R represents a paradigm shift in MCL treatment, offering an effective chemotherapy-free option with improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with previously untreated MCL.

From the Research

Ibr-R vs R-CHOP/BR Mantle Cell Trial Results

  • The study 2 investigated the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab (IR) in patients with indolent clinical forms of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), showing a high rate of complete responses (80%) and undetectable minimal residual disease (87%).
  • In contrast, the study 3 compared ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab (Ibru + BR) to placebo plus bendamustine and rituximab in untreated MCL patients, demonstrating a significant improvement in progression-free survival (80.6 months vs 52.9 months).
  • The combination of acalabrutinib with bendamustine-rituximab was also shown to improve progression-free survival in untreated MCL patients, with a median progression-free survival of 66.4 months compared to 49.6 months in the placebo arm 4.
  • A network meta-analysis 5 suggested that ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab (Ibru + BR) may be superior to R-CHOP in newly diagnosed patients with MCL ineligible for intensive therapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.35 for progression-free survival.
  • The study 6 investigated the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with R-CHOP for patients with previously untreated CD20-positive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, showing that ibrutinib is well tolerated when added to R-CHOP and may improve responses in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Comparison of Treatment Regimens

  • Ibru + BR vs R-CHOP: Ibru + BR may be superior to R-CHOP in terms of progression-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.35 5.
  • Ibru + BR vs VR-CAP: Ibru + BR may also be superior to VR-CAP, with a hazard ratio of 0.55 for progression-free survival 5.
  • Acalabrutinib + BR vs placebo + BR: Acalabrutinib + BR was shown to improve progression-free survival compared to placebo + BR, with a median progression-free survival of 66.4 months vs 49.6 months 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.