What is the diagnostic value of Sgarbossa's criteria (Electrocardiogram criteria) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Sgarbossa's criteria are a valuable diagnostic tool for identifying acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), with a high specificity of 92% for ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more concordant with the QRS complex, as reported by Sgarbossa et al in the GUSTO-1 trial 1. The criteria include three key findings:

  • ST-segment elevation of 1 mm or more concordant with the QRS complex,
  • ST-segment depression of 1 mm or more concordant with the QRS in one or more precordial leads V1 through V3, and
  • ST-segment elevation of 5 mm or more in discordant leads. These criteria are particularly important because LBBB causes secondary ST-T changes that can mimic or mask AMI, and traditional ECG criteria for STEMI are unreliable in LBBB patients. The sensitivity and specificity of these findings for AMI were reported as 73% and 92% for ST-segment elevation, 25% and 96% for ST-segment depression, and 19% and 82% for ST-segment elevation in discordant leads, respectively 1. When using these criteria, it's essential to consider them alongside clinical presentation, cardiac biomarkers, and other diagnostic modalities for optimal patient management in suspected AMI with LBBB. Some studies have reported on the predictive value of these criteria, including Wackers, who found a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of 54%, 97%, and 96%, respectively, for ST-segment changes in patients with LBBB and suspected AMI 1. However, the study by Sgarbossa et al in the GUSTO-1 trial remains the most relevant and highest quality study on this topic, providing the best evidence for the diagnostic value of Sgarbossa's criteria in patients with LBBB 1.

From the Research

Diagnostic Value of Sgarbossa's Criteria

The diagnostic value of Sgarbossa's criteria for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a topic of interest in the medical field.

  • The criteria have been evaluated in several studies, with varying results 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • A study published in 2019 found that ECG criteria, including Sgarbossa's criteria, had low sensitivity (1%-12%) but high specificity (95%-100%) for AMI in patients with LBBB 2.
  • Another study published in 2013 found that a Sgarbossa score of ≥3 had a superb specificity (98%) and positive predictive value for acute myocardial infarction and angiography-confirmed acute coronary occlusion 3.
  • A 2012 study found that replacing the absolute ST-elevation measurement of ≥5 mm in the third component of the Sgarbossa rule with an ST/S ratio less than -0.25 greatly improved the diagnostic utility of the rule for STEMI equivalent 4.
  • A 2020 study introduced a new electrocardiographic algorithm, the BARCELONA algorithm, which was derived and validated to diagnose AMI in patients with LBBB, and found it to be highly sensitive and specific 5.
  • A 2008 meta-analysis found that a Sgarbossa ECG algorithm score of ≥3 was useful for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in patients who present with left bundle branch block on ECG, with a summary sensitivity of 20% and specificity of 98% 6.

Predictive Value

  • The predictive value of Sgarbossa's criteria is influenced by the score, with a score of ≥3 being more specific and having a higher positive predictive value 3, 6.
  • The criteria can be used in combination with other diagnostic tools, such as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing, to improve diagnostic accuracy 2.
  • The BARCELONA algorithm has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing AMI in patients with LBBB, and may be a useful alternative to Sgarbossa's criteria 5.

Limitations

  • The sensitivity of Sgarbossa's criteria is generally low, which may lead to missed diagnoses of AMI in patients with LBBB 2, 6.
  • The criteria may not be useful in excluding acute myocardial infarction, as a score of 0 does not rule out the diagnosis 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.