When should an anal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear be performed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 16, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

When to Perform Anal Pap Smear Screening

Anal Pap smears should be performed in HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM), HIV-infected women with a history of receptive anal intercourse or abnormal cervical Pap tests, and all HIV-infected persons with genital warts. 1

Primary Indications for Anal Pap Screening

HIV-Infected Populations (Established Guidelines)

The 2014 HIV Medicine Association guidelines provide clear recommendations for anal cancer screening 1:

  • HIV-infected MSM - These patients face the highest risk for anal dysplasia and cancer due to HPV infection
  • HIV-infected women with:
    • History of receptive anal intercourse
    • Abnormal cervical Pap test results
  • All HIV-infected persons with genital warts regardless of sexual practices

Important caveat: While these guidelines recommend anal Pap testing for these groups, they note this is a "weak recommendation with moderate quality evidence," reflecting that the evidence base in 2014 was still developing 1.

Expanded Risk Groups (Recent Consensus)

The 2024 International Anal Neoplasia Society guidelines provide more comprehensive, risk-stratified recommendations 2:

Highest priority screening (start at age 35):

  • MSM with HIV
  • Transgender women with HIV

Moderate priority screening (start at age 45):

  • People with HIV (regardless of sexual practices)
  • MSM without HIV
  • Transgender women without HIV

Additional populations to consider (start at age 45 or condition-specific timing):

  • Solid organ transplant recipients (begin 10 years post-transplant)
  • Persons with history of vulvar precancer or cancer (within 1 year of diagnosis)
  • Persons ≥45 years with:
    • History of cervical/vaginal HSIL or cancer
    • Perianal warts
    • Persistent (>1 year) cervical HPV16
    • Autoimmune conditions

Clinical Algorithm for Decision-Making

Step 1: Identify HIV status

  • If HIV-positive → Proceed to Step 2
  • If HIV-negative → Proceed to Step 3

Step 2: For HIV-positive patients, assess:

  • MSM or transgender women? → Screen starting at age 35 2
  • Women with receptive anal intercourse history or abnormal cervical Pap? → Screen 1
  • Presence of genital warts? → Screen 1
  • None of the above? → Screen starting at age 45 2

Step 3: For HIV-negative patients, assess:

  • MSM or transgender women? → Screen starting at age 45 2
  • Solid organ transplant recipient? → Screen starting 10 years post-transplant 2
  • History of vulvar precancer/cancer? → Screen within 1 year of diagnosis 2
  • Age ≥45 with cervical/vaginal HSIL, perianal warts, persistent HPV16, or autoimmune conditions? → Consider screening with shared decision-making 2

Follow-Up After Abnormal Results

When anal cytology screening identifies abnormal findings, high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) should be performed with biopsy of abnormal areas 1. This is critical because cytology alone is a poor predictor of lesion severity 3.

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

Don't screen the general population: The low prevalence of anal cancer in the general population makes routine screening inappropriate 4, 5. Screening must be targeted to high-risk groups.

Don't rely on HPV testing alone for primary screening: HPV testing in MSM populations leads to excessive false positives due to the extremely high prevalence of HPV infection in this group 3. Cytology remains the preferred primary screening modality.

Don't assume screening guidelines are universally accepted: As of 2014, no national health care organizations recommended routine anal Pap screening even for high-risk groups 5. The 2024 IANS guidelines 2 represent the most recent consensus effort to address this gap, but implementation may vary by institution and provider capacity to perform HRA.

Ensure HRA capacity exists: The 2024 guidelines emphasize that screening should only be offered when adequate capacity exists to perform diagnostic HRA procedures 2, as screening without the ability to follow up abnormal results appropriately is not beneficial.

References

Research

Pap smear in the prevention of HPV-related anal cancer: preliminary results of the study in a male population at risk.

Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Societa italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia, 2016

Research

Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review.

World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2016

Research

Anal Pap smears and anal cancer: what dermatologists should know.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014

Related Questions

For a 35-year-old gay man without immunosuppression or symptoms, does the US Task Force recommend routine anal Pap screening?
Should a 1.1 cm ovarian follicle be followed up with repeat ultrasound?
How should I manage a 10-month-old infant with a rectal temperature of 100.6 °F and two episodes of vomiting?
What is the recommended evaluation and management for a 10-year-old male with pubic pain, intermittent dysuria for 2–3 months, decreased appetite, and urine specific gravity of 1.015?
How should a 10-year-old boy with two episodes of diarrhea, mild abdominal pain, and no fever be managed?
Which of the following statements about sexually transmitted diseases is true?
Is a dose of 2 g cefepime (cefepime) combined with 250 mg tazobactam sufficient for adequate antimicrobial coverage?
What is the recommended approach to correcting hyponatremia in a pediatric patient, including differentiation between acute and chronic onset and management of symptomatic versus asymptomatic cases?
How should unfractionated heparin be dosed and monitored in a 50‑kg patient with active microvascular thrombosis, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), antiphospholipid antibodies, and normal renal function (creatinine 1.2 mg/dL)?
How should moderate hyponatremia (serum sodium 120‑129 mEq/L) be corrected in a pediatric patient?
For a 50‑kg patient with active microvascular thrombosis, antiphospholipid antibodies, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), and normal renal function, can a 5,000‑unit intravenous bolus administered every six hours replace the recommended weight‑based loading dose and continuous heparin infusion?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.