What is the best clinic in the country for pacemaker (permanent artificial cardiac pacemaker) lead extraction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The Cleveland Clinic is the best clinic in the country for pacemaker lead extraction due to its high volume of procedures, advanced techniques, and multidisciplinary team approach. When considering pacemaker lead extraction, it is crucial to prioritize centers with extensive experience and the necessary facilities to manage potential complications, as highlighted in the American Heart Association's scientific statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management 1.

Key Considerations for Pacemaker Lead Extraction

  • High-volume centers like the Cleveland Clinic have a higher success rate and can manage complications more effectively.
  • The presence of cardiothoracic surgery on site is essential for backup in case of emergencies, as noted in the guidelines 1.
  • Advanced techniques such as laser lead extraction technology are utilized to minimize risks and improve outcomes.

Importance of a Multidisciplinary Team

  • A team approach involving electrophysiologists, cardiac surgeons, and other specialists enhances the safety and success of the procedure.
  • Real-time imaging during the procedure is critical for precision and minimizing complications.

Patient Care and Outcomes

  • Pre-procedure planning, advanced extraction techniques, and post-procedure care are all crucial components of a comprehensive approach to pacemaker lead extraction.
  • The Cleveland Clinic's research and expertise in improving lead extraction methods contribute to better patient outcomes and reduced morbidity and mortality.

From the Research

Pacemaker Lead Extraction Clinics

There are no specific studies that directly compare the quality of clinics for pacemaker lead extraction in the country. However, the following information can be gathered from the available studies:

  • The studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 discuss various techniques and tools used for pacemaker lead extraction, including laser sheaths, mechanical dilator sheaths, and electrosurgical dissection sheaths.
  • These studies were conducted at different institutions and report varying success rates and complication rates for lead extraction procedures.

Techniques and Tools Used

Some of the techniques and tools used for pacemaker lead extraction include:

  • Laser sheaths, as discussed in the study 4, which reported a complete lead removal rate of 94% with the use of laser tools.
  • Mechanical dilator sheaths, such as the Evolution system, which was used in the studies 3 and 5 with reported complete procedural success rates of 82% and 87.9%, respectively.
  • Electrosurgical dissection sheaths, which were mentioned in the study 6 as a promising new tool for lead extraction.

Institution-Specific Data

The study 2 reported on the outcomes of high-risk lead extraction using a hybrid technique at a single institution, with a 100% success rate for complete lead removal. The study 3 reported on the experience of a single center with percutaneous lead extraction using the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath, with a clinical success rate of 100%. The study 5 reported on the experience of a single institution with transvenous lead extraction using the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath, with an overall clinical success rate of 98.5%.

Limitations

There are no direct comparisons between clinics or institutions for pacemaker lead extraction, and the available studies do not provide a comprehensive ranking of clinics. The studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 have different sample sizes, patient populations, and follow-up periods, which can limit the generalizability of their findings.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Percutaneous extraction of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads with evolution mechanical dilator sheath: a single-centre experience.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.