What is the mortality rate associated with pacemaker (permanent artificial cardiac pacemaker) lead extraction?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The mortality rate associated with pacemaker lead extraction is approximately 0.0%-1.0%, with most studies reporting rates of less than 1%. This low mortality rate is consistent across multiple studies, with procedural success rates consistently reported to be very high, with most studies reporting rates of >95% 1. The mortality rate for pacemaker lead extraction is significantly lower compared to treatment with antibiotics only, with a 1-year mortality rate of 13.3% for patients who underwent extraction compared to 38.1% for those who did not 1.

Key Factors Influencing Mortality Rate

  • The timing of CIED extraction, with early extraction associated with lower 1-year mortality rates 1
  • The experience of the surgical team and the facility's ability to handle potential complications
  • The patient's overall health, with those having multiple comorbidities facing a higher risk

Minimizing Risks

  • Pacemaker extractions should only be performed by experienced electrophysiologists in facilities equipped to handle potential complications
  • Patients should be closely monitored during and after the procedure, with immediate access to cardiac surgery if needed
  • Careful patient selection and thorough pre-procedural planning are essential to minimize risks

Clinical Outcomes

  • Procedural complication rates are consistently low, ranging from 0.0%-4.0% 1
  • Reinfection rates are significantly lower when complete extraction occurs, with rates ranging from 1.0%-5.3% compared to 20.8%-50.0% for incomplete extraction 1

From the Research

Mortality Rate Associated with Pacemaker Lead Extraction

  • The mortality rate associated with pacemaker lead extraction can be estimated from various studies:
    • A study published in 2014 2 reported an all-cause mortality within 30 days of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of 2.2%.
    • Another study published in 2024 3 reported an in-hospital mortality rate of 6% among patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device extraction, including pacemaker lead extraction.
    • A study published in 2010 4 reported 57 deaths associated with device-assisted lead extraction between 1995 and 2008, highlighting the potential risks of the procedure.
  • Predictors of mortality after pacemaker lead extraction or implantation have been identified in several studies:
    • A study published in 2024 5 found that older age, being female, having dual-chamber pacemaker, higher Charlson comorbidity index, presence of complications, and New York Heart Association class III or IV were associated with mortality.
    • A study published in 2016 6 found that pre-existing chronic kidney disease and history of smoking were independent risk factors for early mortality after temporary-permanent pacemaker placement.
  • Overall, the mortality rate associated with pacemaker lead extraction varies depending on the study and population, but it is generally considered a high-risk procedure that requires careful consideration and skilled management.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Deaths and cardiovascular injuries due to device-assisted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and pacemaker lead extraction.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.