Which of the following statements about fungal infections is NOT correct? A) Esophageal candidiasis is the most common form; B) The majority of women will experience an episode of vaginal candidiasis in their lifetime; C) The presence of fungus in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter always constitutes a urinary tract infection; D) Hepatosplenic candidiasis usually occurs in hematology patients with prolonged neutropenia; E) In the absence of an apparent risk factor for fungal infection, testing for HIV should also be performed.

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 30, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

The INCORRECT Statement is C

The presence of fungus in a patient with an indwelling urinary catheter does NOT always constitute a urinary tract infection - this is candiduria (fungal colonization), which is frequently asymptomatic and does not require treatment in most cases.

Analysis of Each Statement

Statement C - The Incorrect Answer

Funguria (candiduria) in catheterized patients represents colonization in the vast majority of cases, not infection 1, 2, 3. The IDSA guidelines explicitly state that candiduria in catheterized patients is "no more significant an indicator of invasive disease than isolation from any other single site" 4. Antifungal therapy is not indicated for patients with asymptomatic candiduria 3. Simply removing the indwelling urinary catheter is often sufficient to clear candiduria without antifungal therapy 3. The guidelines emphasize that "more research is warranted into its diagnosis, need for treatment, and prevention" of funguria, acknowledging the common overtreatment of this condition 1.

Statement A - Correct

While esophageal candidiasis is indeed a common form of candidiasis, particularly in immunocompromised patients, the evidence shows it occurs most frequently in HIV/AIDS patients with CD4+ counts <100 cells/mm³ 5. However, the statement may be misleading as vulvovaginal candidiasis actually affects a much larger absolute number of patients globally 6, 7.

Statement B - Correct

This statement is accurate. Vulvovaginal candidiasis affects approximately 75-80% of women at least once during their lifetime 7, 8, 9. The Global Candidiasis Guideline confirms that "vulvovaginal candidiasis is estimated to affect 75% of women at least once during their lives" 6. About 50% of women experience at least a second episode, and up to 10% develop recurrent infections 6.

Statement D - Correct

Hepatosplenic candidiasis (chronic disseminated candidiasis) is a well-recognized complication that "usually occurs in hematology patients with prolonged neutropenia" 10. This condition specifically develops "as a complication of candidemia in neutropenic patients, especially when patients with gastrointestinal tract mucositis do not receive antifungal prophylaxis" 10. The guideline strongly supports imaging in "haematology patients at high risk with prolonged neutropenia and persistent fever or right-upper quadrant pain" to exclude chronic disseminated candidiasis 6.

Statement E - Correct

When fungal infections occur without apparent risk factors, HIV testing is appropriate. Esophageal candidiasis was historically considered an AIDS-defining illness 5, 11. While it can occur in HIV-negative patients with other immunosuppressive conditions or even rarely in immunocompetent individuals, the absence of obvious risk factors should prompt HIV evaluation 5, 12.

Key Clinical Pitfall

The most common error is overtreating asymptomatic candiduria in catheterized patients. This leads to unnecessary antifungal exposure, increased costs, and potential development of resistance. The appropriate management is catheter removal when feasible, not empiric antifungal therapy 3.

References

Guideline

diagnosis of infection in sepsis.

Intensive Care Medicine, 2001

Research

Esophageal candidiasis in HIV-negative patients.

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.