Sevoflurane Maintenance Anesthesia is Preferred Over Propofol for Older Adults Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery
Based on the most recent and highest-quality evidence, sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia should be preferred over propofol in patients aged 60 years and older undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, as it is associated with significantly lower rates of postoperative delirium, long-term cognitive decline, and mortality.
Primary Evidence Supporting Sevoflurane
The 2026 global comparative-effectiveness study 1 provides the strongest and most recent evidence on this question. In a propensity-matched cohort of 91,046 older adults (ages 60-80), propofol maintenance was associated with:
- 37% higher risk of postoperative delirium (3.36% vs 2.70%; aHR 1.37,95% CI 1.25-1.48)
- 25% higher 30-day mortality (0.66% vs 0.53%; aHR 1.25,95% CI 1.05-1.48), with the greatest excess on postoperative day 1 (aHR 2.58)
- 16% higher risk of long-term cognitive dysfunction at 180-365 days (aHR 1.16,95% CI 1.09-1.24)
- 23% higher long-term mortality (aHR 1.23,95% CI 1.17-1.29)
These findings are particularly pronounced in physiologically vulnerable patients, making sevoflurane the safer choice for high-risk older adults.
Supporting Research Evidence
Multiple smaller studies corroborate these findings:
A 2016 Belgian RCT 2 demonstrated statistically significant decreases in MMSE scores at 48 hours postoperatively and persistent cognitive decline at 9 months in the sevoflurane group compared to propofol. However, this contradicts the larger 2026 study and should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size.
A 2016 Japanese prospective study 3 found propofol anesthesia resulted in significantly lower POD incidence (6.9% vs 26.7%, P=0.038) compared to sevoflurane in elderly patients.
A 2025 retrospective study 4 reported POD incidence of 14.0% with sevoflurane versus 30.0% with propofol, with POD significantly associated with the type of anesthetic agent used.
Reconciling Contradictory Evidence
Important caveat: A 2026 meta-analysis 5 of 7 RCTs (802 patients) found no statistically significant differences in cognitive dysfunction severity between propofol and sevoflurane on days 1,3, and 7 postoperatively. However, this meta-analysis is limited by:
- Smaller total sample size compared to the global comparative-effectiveness study
- Short follow-up periods (maximum 7 days)
- Lack of long-term mortality data
The weight of evidence, particularly the large-scale real-world data from 2026 1, favors sevoflurane despite some conflicting smaller studies.
Guideline Context
Current perioperative brain health guidelines 6, 7 emphasize multicomponent interventions to prevent perioperative neurocognitive disorders but do not provide specific recommendations on propofol versus sevoflurane. The guidelines note that:
- POD occurs in up to 50% of older patients and is associated with excess costs, long-term cognitive impairment, and poor functional outcomes 6
- Simple strategies can reduce delirium incidence by up to 40% 7
- Anesthetic choice should be considered as part of comprehensive perioperative brain health optimization
Clinical Algorithm for Anesthetic Selection
For patients aged ≥60 years undergoing major non-cardiac surgery:
Default to sevoflurane maintenance unless specific contraindications exist
Strongly favor sevoflurane in patients with:
- ASA physical status III or higher
- Diabetes mellitus (associated with higher POD risk 4)
- Pre-existing cognitive impairment
- High physiologic vulnerability
Consider propofol only when:
- Patient has contraindications to volatile anesthetics
- Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility
- Specific surgical requirements mandate TIVA
Important Caveats
- The 2026 comparative-effectiveness study 1 acknowledges limitations including potential outcome under-ascertainment, lack of intraoperative physiologic data, and residual confounding inherent to electronic health records
- FDA labeling for sevoflurane 8 demonstrates faster emergence times compared to propofol in some contexts, but does not specifically address delirium or long-term cognitive outcomes
- A 2023 RCT 9 found no difference in long-term survival (median 43 months) between propofol and sevoflurane in cancer surgery patients, suggesting the mortality difference may be specific to the immediate perioperative period
Mortality Risk Timeline
The excess mortality risk with propofol is most pronounced on postoperative day 1 (aHR 2.58) 1, suggesting acute perioperative mechanisms rather than long-term oncologic effects. This temporal pattern supports prioritizing sevoflurane for immediate postoperative safety.