Can a 40% Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) burden affect the Ejection Fraction (EF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Yes, a 40% Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) burden can significantly affect the Ejection Fraction (EF) and potentially lead to PVC-induced cardiomyopathy. This high burden of PVCs can cause ventricular dyssynchrony, where the heart's pumping action becomes inefficient due to poorly coordinated contractions. Over time, this mechanical inefficiency can lead to ventricular remodeling and a decline in EF. According to a study published in Circulation in 2016 1, a PVC burden of ≥24% is independently associated with cardiomyopathy, and radiofrequency ablation has been shown to result in normalization of EF in 82% of patients with LV dysfunction within 6 months.

Key Points to Consider

  • A high PVC burden can lead to ventricular dyssynchrony and a decline in EF
  • Treatment options include beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, or antiarrhythmic medications
  • Catheter ablation may be considered for patients with persistent symptoms and reduced EF despite medical therapy
  • Regular cardiac monitoring with ECGs and echocardiograms is essential to track progress and adjust treatment as needed

Treatment Options

  • Beta-blockers (such as metoprolol 25-200 mg daily)
  • Calcium channel blockers (such as diltiazem 120-360 mg daily)
  • Antiarrhythmic medications (such as amiodarone 200 mg daily after loading)
  • Catheter ablation, which has shown success rates of 70-90% in eliminating PVCs and improving cardiac function, as recommended by the European Heart Journal in 2015 1 and 2017 1

Importance of Early Treatment

If PVCs are the primary cause of reduced EF, successful treatment often leads to significant improvement or normalization of cardiac function within 3-6 months, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. As noted in the study published in Circulation in 2016 1, patients who did not respond to radiofrequency ablation had progression of cardiomyopathy, and there was no improvement in EF among a control group who had a similar burden of PVCs and did not receive radiofrequency ablation.

From the Research

Effect of 40% PVC Burden on Ejection Fraction (EF)

  • A 40% Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) burden can potentially affect the Ejection Fraction (EF) as studies have shown that frequent PVCs can cause left ventricular dysfunction 2, 3.
  • The study by 2 found that patients with frequent PVCs (>1000/24 h) had a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment, suggesting that reducing PVC burden can improve EF.
  • Another study by 4 found that patients with PVC-induced cardiomyopathy had recovery of left ventricular dysfunction after ablation of frequent PVCs, with the majority of patients (68%) having a recovery of LV function within 4 months.

Variability in PVC Burden and EF

  • The study by 5 found that there is a significant variation in 24-hour PVC burden when measured over a 14-day period in patients with a PVC burden of more than 5%, which might impact critical clinical decisions.
  • This variability in PVC burden could potentially affect the assessment and management of EF, as a higher PVC burden has been associated with decreased EF 6, 3.

Clinical Implications

  • The studies suggest that a 40% PVC burden can be a significant factor in affecting EF, and reducing PVC burden through treatments such as RFA or antiarrhythmic drugs can improve EF 2, 4.
  • Clinicians should consider the potential impact of PVC burden on EF when making clinical decisions, and further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between PVC burden and EF 6.

Related Questions

What percentage of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) on Holter monitoring is considered low or high?
What's the next step in managing a 59-year-old female with symptoms and a 7-day monitor showing a 2.94% premature atrial contraction (PAC) burden, rare premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden, and brief atrial runs (longest 26 beats)?
What is the next best treatment plan for a 39-year-old female with a past medical history of palpitations and chest pain, whose echocardiogram shows an Ejection Fraction (EF) of 63% and an extended Holter monitor reveals sinus rhythm with rare Premature Atrial Contractions (PACs), Premature Ventricular Contractions (PVCs), and Non-Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT) with no symptoms?
What antiarrhythmic medication is suitable for treating premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in the elderly?
What is the clinical significance of an 18% premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden without symptoms reported on a Holter monitor?
How to manage a patient with stable blood pressure in the morning and afternoon, but with spikes in the afternoon and nighttime, who is currently taking losartan and Exforge (amlodipine and valsartan)?
What is the most suitable treatment option for a case of small bowel obstruction with an ileal stricture 10 cm from the ileocecal valve, lymph node enlargement, and necrotic-like areas in the lower ascending colon?
What is the next treatment of choice for a patient who progressed on FOLFOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, leucovorin) adjuvant therapy after colon surgery?
What is the treatment for cat scratch disease?
What is the dosage and administration protocol for atropine eye drops?
How to administer atropine (anticholinergic medication) sublingually?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.