On which page of the systematic review is the I-squared statistic of 98.5% reported?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 24, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

I² Statistic Location

The I² value of 98.5% is not found in the provided evidence. After reviewing all studies, the closest value is I² = 98.4%, which appears on page 5 of the British Journal of Sports Medicine systematic review 1.

Specific Location Details

In the para-athlete injury systematic review 1, the I² = 98.4% statistic is reported in the section titled "Incidence rate of musculoskeletal injuries in para athletes". The exact text states:

"The incidence rate was 14.3 injuries per 1000 athlete-days (95% CI 11.9 to 16.8; I²: 98.4%; prediction interval was 0.1–0.2)."

This appears in the results section describing pooled estimates from 20 studies (n=11,608) that reported injury incidence rates.

Other High I² Values in the Evidence

Several other extremely high I² values appear throughout the provided studies, reflecting substantial heterogeneity:

  • I² = 98.3%: Large sample size subgroup for injury prevalence 1
  • I² = 98.2%: Higher methodological quality studies for injury prevalence 1
  • I² = 97.7%: Overall pooled prevalence estimate 1
  • I² = 98.15%: Immigrants with Trypanosoma cruzi 2
  • I² = 98.5% (if this exists): Not located in any provided document

The value you're seeking (98.5%) does not appear in the evidence provided. The 98.4% value is the closest match and represents heterogeneity in injury incidence rates across para-athlete studies.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.