What size subdural hematoma (subdural hemorrhage) typically warrants consideration for craniotomy (surgical removal of part of the skull)

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Subdural hematomas typically warrant consideration for craniotomy when they are large enough to cause significant mass effect, midline shift, or result in severe neurological symptoms, with the specific size threshold not explicitly defined in the provided evidence for subdural hematomas but generally considered in the context of other types of intracranial hemorrhages. The decision for surgical intervention in subdural hematomas depends on multiple factors beyond just size, including the patient's clinical status, neurological deficits, and deterioration over time 1.

  • Acute subdural hematomas with rapid neurological decline almost always require urgent surgical evacuation.
  • Chronic subdural hematomas may be managed conservatively if smaller and asymptomatic.
  • The surgical threshold may be lower in patients with poor Glasgow Coma Scale scores, pupillary abnormalities, or increasing intracranial pressure. Surgery aims to relieve pressure on the brain, prevent herniation, and improve neurological outcomes.
  • Alternative procedures like burr hole drainage may be considered for chronic subdural hematomas that are less than 10mm thick with minimal mass effect, though this specific guideline is not directly supported by the provided evidence for subdural hematomas. The neurosurgeon's clinical judgment, incorporating radiological findings and the patient's overall condition, ultimately determines whether craniotomy is necessary, considering guidelines that suggest surgical decompression for cerebellar hemorrhages >3 cm in diameter or those associated with brainstem compression or hydrocephalus 1.

From the Research

Subdural Hematoma Size for Craniotomy

The size of a subdural hematoma that typically warrants consideration for craniotomy is a critical factor in determining the appropriate course of treatment.

  • A subdural hematoma with a thickness greater than or equal to 10 mm or a midline shift greater than or equal to 5 mm is generally recommended for surgical evacuation, regardless of the patient's Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 2, 3, 4.
  • The decision to perform a craniotomy is influenced by various factors, including the patient's neurologic condition, imaging characteristics, and presence of mass effect or elevated intracranial pressure 4.
  • In patients with an acute subdural hematoma, the ratio of hematoma thickness to midline shift can be a useful prognostic tool, with a lower ratio indicating a poorer prognosis 5.
  • Computed tomographic criteria, such as hematoma thickness and midline shift, can be used to estimate outcome and determine indications for surgery, with a hematoma thickness of approximately 18 mm and a midline shift of 20 mm associated with a 50% survival rate 6.

Key Considerations

  • The size and location of the subdural hematoma, as well as the presence of midline shift, are critical factors in determining the need for surgical intervention 3, 4.
  • The patient's neurologic condition, including the GCS score, is also an important consideration in determining the appropriate course of treatment 2, 3, 4.
  • The use of craniotomy or craniectomy is generally preferred over burr holes for the evacuation of acute subdural hematomas, based on available data 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.