What is the sensitivity of Fibroscan (Transient Elastography) to liver cirrhosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Fibroscan has a sensitivity of 88% for detecting liver cirrhosis, as reported in the most recent and highest quality study 1. The sensitivity of Fibroscan for liver cirrhosis is a critical parameter in assessing its effectiveness as a non-invasive diagnostic tool.

  • The study published in 2025 1 provides the most up-to-date and reliable evidence on this topic, superseding earlier studies.
  • According to this study, a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) cutoff value of 13 kPa yields a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94% for detecting cirrhosis (F4) in patients with HCV.
  • It is essential to note that the sensitivity and specificity of Fibroscan may vary depending on the underlying liver disease and patient population.
  • For example, the study also reports that for HCV/HIV coinfection, a TE-LSM cutoff value of 14 kPa had a sensitivity of 83%–100% and a specificity of 84%–93% for detecting cirrhosis (F4) 1.
  • In comparison, an earlier study published in 2017 1 reported a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91% for diagnosing cirrhosis (F4) using TE, but this study is less recent and may not reflect the current state of evidence.
  • Another study published in 2017 1 evaluated the use of VCTE vs FIB-4 for diagnosing cirrhosis in adults with NAFLD and reported a sensitivity of 0.90 for VCTE, but this study focused on a different patient population and may not be directly applicable to the question at hand.
  • Overall, the most recent and highest quality study 1 provides the best evidence for the sensitivity of Fibroscan in detecting liver cirrhosis.

From the Research

Sensitivity of Fibroscan to Liver Cirrhosis

  • The sensitivity of Fibroscan (Transient Elastography) to liver cirrhosis has been evaluated in several studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • A study published in 2021 found that the optimal cut-off values for liver cirrhosis diagnosis using FibroScan were 8.85,11.75, and 8.70 kPa, with accuracy rates of 78.7%, 78.4%, and 79.2%, respectively 2.
  • Another study published in 2006 found that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the diagnosis of cirrhosis using FibroScan was 0.95, with a cutoff value of 14.6 kPa having a positive predictive value of 74% and a negative predictive value of 96% 3.
  • A 2012 study found that the optimal cut-off value for predicting liver cirrhosis using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) was 1.60 m/s, with a sensitivity of 92.3% and a specificity of 96.5% 4.
  • A 2006 study published in the journal Gut found that using a cut-off value of 17.6 kPa, patients with cirrhosis were detected with a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% 5.
  • A 2015 study found that Fibroscan was moderately accurate in diagnosing grade I esophageal varices and less accurate in diagnosing grades II and III varices in all cirrhotic patients, irrespective of the underlying etiology 6.

Optimal Cut-off Values

  • The optimal cut-off values for liver cirrhosis diagnosis using FibroScan vary across studies, ranging from 8.70 to 17.6 kPa 2, 3, 5.
  • A cutoff value of 16.9 kPa was 83.8% sensitive in diagnosing esophageal varices in non-viral-cirrhotic patients, whereas a cutoff value of 19.9 kPa was 83.4% sensitive in diagnosing esophageal varices in patients with viral hepatitis 6.

Diagnostic Accuracy

  • The diagnostic accuracy of FibroScan for liver cirrhosis diagnosis has been found to be high, with AUROC values ranging from 0.80 to 0.96 3, 5.
  • The sensitivity and specificity of FibroScan for liver cirrhosis diagnosis also vary across studies, ranging from 74% to 96% 3, 4, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.