Indications for FibroScan in Chronic Liver Diseases
FibroScan (transient elastography) is primarily indicated for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver diseases to guide treatment decisions, evaluate disease progression, and monitor for cirrhosis. 1
Primary Indications
Chronic Viral Hepatitis
Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB):
- To determine need for antiviral therapy by assessing significant fibrosis (≥F2)
- To detect cirrhosis (F4) for appropriate surveillance
- Optimal cutoff values: 7.2-8.8 kPa for significant fibrosis; 11.0-14.1 kPa for cirrhosis 1
Chronic Hepatitis C (HCV):
- Assessment of fibrosis stage to guide treatment decisions
- Monitoring of fibrosis regression after successful antiviral therapy
Non-viral Liver Diseases
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD):
- Evaluation of fibrosis in patients with metabolic risk factors
- FIB-4 screening (cutoff ≥1.30) followed by FibroScan (≥8 kPa) for patients requiring hepatology referral 1
Alcohol-related Liver Disease (ALD):
- Assessment of fibrosis severity
- Monitoring of fibrosis progression/regression with abstinence
Autoimmune Liver Diseases:
Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm
Initial Assessment:
- Use inexpensive serum biomarkers first (FIB-4, APRI)
- If FIB-4 ≥1.30 or APRI >0.5, proceed to FibroScan 1
FibroScan Interpretation:
- <10 kPa: Rules out compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD)
- 10-15 kPa: Gray zone (consider platelet count)
- ≥15 kPa: Highly suggestive of cACLD
- ≥15 kPa + platelets <150,000: Confirms cACLD 1
Post-Treatment Monitoring:
- Patients with previous advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis require continued monitoring despite successful treatment 1
Special Populations
Patients with Bleeding Disorders:
- FibroScan recommended after stratification with FIB-4 or APRI
- Particularly important in those previously exposed to HBV/HCV 1
Patients with Metabolic Syndrome:
- Even without viral hepatitis history, FibroScan indicated when FIB-4 ≥1.30 1
Advantages Over Other Methods
- More accurate than APRI or FIB-4 for diagnosing cirrhosis (AUROC 0.902 vs. 0.707) 1
- Non-invasive, rapid (5 minutes), and immediately available results 1
- High reproducibility with excellent patient acceptance 3
- Reduces need for liver biopsy in most patients 4
Limitations and Pitfalls
Technical Limitations:
- Requires ≥10 successful measurements
- Success rate ≥60% and interquartile range <30% of median value
- Unreliable in patients with ascites, obesity, or narrow intercostal spaces 1
False Positives:
- Acute hepatitis
- Extrahepatic biliary tract obstruction
- Elevated ALT levels can overestimate fibrosis 1
False Negatives:
- Macronodular cirrhosis
- Inactive cirrhosis 5
Combining Methods for Improved Accuracy
- Sequential use of FibroScan after serum biomarkers improves diagnostic performance
- Combining FibroScan with FibroTest or ELF test can reduce need for liver biopsy by 61-65% 1
- Using both approaches (biological and physical) increases diagnostic accuracy 4
FibroScan has transformed the management of chronic liver diseases by providing a reliable non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy for fibrosis assessment, with particular strength in early detection of cirrhosis and significant fibrosis that guide critical treatment decisions.