What is the role of Amiodarone (antiarrhythmic medication) in treating Atrial Fibrillation (AF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Amiodarone is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in patients with refractory AF or those who have failed other treatments, due to its ability to control both rate and rhythm, as demonstrated in studies such as the CTAF study 1. The use of amiodarone in AF is supported by its efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm, with a study showing that 69% of patients treated with amiodarone remained in sinus rhythm over a 16-month follow-up period, compared to 39% of those treated with propafenone or sotalol 1. Some key points to consider when using amiodarone for AF include:

  • Typical dosing begins with a loading dose of 400-600 mg daily for 2-4 weeks, followed by a maintenance dose of 100-200 mg daily
  • Amiodarone has a very long half-life, allowing for once-daily dosing, but also meaning that side effects may persist for weeks after discontinuation
  • Regular monitoring of thyroid, liver, and pulmonary function, as well as eye examinations, is necessary due to the potential for adverse effects such as thyroid dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis, liver toxicity, corneal deposits, and skin photosensitivity
  • Amiodarone interacts with many medications, particularly warfarin and digoxin, often requiring dose adjustments of these drugs
  • The SAFE-T trial demonstrated that amiodarone is effective in converting persistent AF to sinus rhythm, with a median time to recurrence of AF significantly longer than with sotalol or placebo 1
  • Amiodarone is typically reserved as a second-line agent for AF when other options have failed or are contraindicated, especially in younger patients who would require long-term therapy, as stated in the 2006 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation 1. In patients with heart failure, amiodarone is effective in restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm, even in the presence of enlarged left atria, and may improve the success of electrical cardioversion, as shown in studies such as the CTAF study 1 and guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure 1. Overall, amiodarone is a valuable treatment option for AF, particularly in patients with refractory AF or those who have failed other treatments, due to its efficacy in controlling both rate and rhythm, as demonstrated in studies such as the CTAF study 1 and the SAFE-T trial 1.

From the Research

Role of Amiodarone in Treating Atrial Fibrillation

  • Amiodarone is an effective antiarrhythmic medication for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), with studies showing it can restore sinus rhythm in a significant proportion of patients 2, 3.
  • The medication has been shown to be almost twice as likely as placebo to restore sinus rhythm, with an effectiveness of 85% compared to 43% for placebo 2.
  • However, the use of amiodarone for AF treatment has been associated with potential serious noncardiac side effects, such as pulmonary fibrosis, thyroid dysfunction, hepatitis, and neurotoxicity 4, 5.
  • Low-dose amiodarone has been found to be effective for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of AF or flutter, with a low incidence of serious side effects 3, 6.
  • The latest European Society of Cardiology AF guidelines recommend amiodarone for long-term rhythm control in all AF patients, but suggest considering other antiarrhythmic drugs first due to its extracardiac toxicity 5.

Factors Affecting Amiodarone's Effectiveness

  • Larger left atrial size and longer duration of atrial fibrillation have been found to decrease amiodarone's effectiveness in restoring sinus rhythm 2.
  • Mitral stenosis or chronic arrhythmia have also been identified as factors that can make amiodarone ineffective 3.
  • Patient characteristics, such as left ventricular function, should be taken into account when considering amiodarone treatment for AF 3.

Comparison with Other Treatments

  • Amiodarone has been compared to other antiarrhythmic drugs, such as class I drugs, and found to have a lower incidence of proarrhythmia and heart failure exacerbation 6.
  • Catheter ablation is another treatment option for AF, and its risks and benefits should be considered in comparison to amiodarone treatment 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Is amiodarone still a reasonable therapeutic option for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation?

Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.