Is ciprofloxacin and doxycycline adequate for coverage of severe cellulitis with possible Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) versus Pseudomonas?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the FDA Drug Label

Ciprofloxacin has been shown to be active against most strains of the following microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections... Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms ... Staphylococcus saprophyticus ... Aerobic gram-negative microorganisms ... Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown ... Ciprofloxacin exhibits in vitro minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 1 μg/mL or less against most (≥ 90%) strains of the following microorganisms; however, the safety and effectiveness of ciprofloxacin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials ... Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms ... Staphylococcus haemolyticus

Most strains of Burkholderia cepacia and some strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are resistant to ciprofloxacin as are most anaerobic bacteria, including Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium difficile.

For testing aerobic microorganisms other than Haemophilus influenzae , Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeaea: MIC (μg/mL)Interpretation ≤ 1 Susceptible (S) 2 Intermediate (I) ≥ 4 Resistant (R)

Ciprofloxacin is active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, for MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), ciprofloxacin's effectiveness is not established as the provided drug label only mentions activity against methicillin-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus.

  • Ciprofloxacin may be used for coverage of Pseudomonas.
  • Doxycycline may be used for coverage of MRSA, but this information is not found in the provided ciprofloxacin drug label. The combination of ciprofloxacin and doxycycline may provide coverage for severe cellulitis with possible MRSA versus Pseudomonas, but the FDA drug label for ciprofloxacin does not directly answer the question regarding the use of this combination for this specific purpose 1.

From the Research

Ciprofloxacin and doxycycline together may not provide optimal coverage for severe cellulitis with possible MRSA versus Pseudomonas. For severe cellulitis with concern for both pathogens, a more appropriate regimen would be vancomycin (15-20 mg/kg IV every 8-12 hours) plus either piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5g IV every 6-8 hours) or cefepime (2g IV every 8 hours) 2. While ciprofloxacin offers good Pseudomonas coverage, and doxycycline has some activity against MRSA, this combination has limitations. Doxycycline's MRSA coverage is inconsistent for severe infections, and resistance to fluoroquinolones is increasing in both organisms. Additionally, the FDA has advised that fluoroquinolones should be reserved for infections lacking alternative options due to serious side effects. For severe skin infections with these specific concerns, the vancomycin plus anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam approach provides more reliable coverage of both pathogens and follows current practice guidelines for complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Some studies suggest that combination antibiotic treatment for MRSA infections may be beneficial, but the evidence is not yet conclusive 3. However, vancomycin remains an acceptable treatment option, with moves toward individualized dosing to a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target 2. Once culture results are available, therapy should be narrowed to target the specific pathogen identified. It's also worth noting that other antibiotics, such as linezolid, may be effective against MRSA, but their use should be reserved for specific cases 2. In general, the choice of antibiotic regimen should be guided by the severity of the infection, the suspected pathogens, and the patient's individual characteristics. The use of amikacin sulfate has been reported to be effective in treating Pseudomonas cellulitis in certain cases, but its use is not commonly recommended for human patients 4. Overall, the most appropriate treatment regimen for severe cellulitis with possible MRSA versus Pseudomonas should be determined on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the latest evidence and guidelines.

References

Research

Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and beyond.

Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015

Research

Amikacin therapy for Pseudomonas cellulitis in an Amazon parrot.

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 1985

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.