Significance of the NIHSS Score in Managing Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a critical standardized assessment tool that strongly predicts patient outcomes after stroke, with scores >16 forecasting high probability of death or severe disability and scores <6 indicating good recovery prospects, making it essential for guiding acute treatment decisions including thrombolytic therapy. 1
What is the NIHSS?
The NIHSS is a standardized, validated instrument that:
- Assesses severity of neurological impairment after stroke
- Contains 11 items examining different neurological functions
- Ranges from 0 to 42 points (higher scores indicate greater impairment)
- Takes only 5-10 minutes to administer
- Can be performed by any trained clinician 1
Clinical Significance of NIHSS Scores
Outcome Prediction
- Score <6: Forecasts good recovery
- Score >16: Forecasts high probability of death or severe disability 1
- Score ≤7: Associated with only 14.8% risk of early neurological worsening
- Score >7: Associated with 65.9% risk of early neurological worsening 2
Treatment Decision-Making
- Guides decisions about acute stroke therapy, particularly thrombolytic treatment
- Influences patient selection for specific interventions
- Helps stratify patients according to severity and likely outcome 1
Implementation in Clinical Practice
When to Perform NIHSS Assessment
- At the time of presentation/hospital admission (within first 24 hours)
- Before diagnostic cerebral angiography (if applicable)
- At the time of acute care discharge
- Upon transfer to rehabilitation if previous scores are not available 1
Who Should Perform NIHSS
- All professionals involved in stroke care should be trained and certified
- Certification involves watching training videos and passing an examination
- Inter-rater reliability between examiners is high for most items 1
Special Considerations and Limitations
Posterior Circulation Strokes
- NIHSS may underestimate severity of posterior circulation strokes
- Patients with posterior circulation strokes often present with lower NIHSS scores (median 2 vs. 7 for anterior circulation)
- Lower cutoff values are needed for posterior circulation strokes:
- Optimal cutoff for outcome prediction: 4 for posterior vs. 8 for anterior circulation
- For >80% sensitivity in detecting poor outcomes: 2 for posterior vs. 4 for anterior circulation 3
- 15% of patients with "minor" posterior circulation strokes (NIHSS ≤4) still have poor outcomes at 3 months 3
Clinical Profiles Beyond Total Score
- Patients with identical NIHSS scores may have different outcomes based on the pattern of deficits
- Patients with decreased level of consciousness and language deficits may have worse outcomes than those with equivalent motor deficits 4
Practical Application in Emergency Settings
Integration into Stroke Protocols
- NIHSS should be part of organized protocols for emergency evaluation
- Goal: Complete evaluation and treatment decisions within 60 minutes of arrival
- For potential thrombolytic candidates, CT should be completed within 25 minutes and interpreted within 45 minutes of arrival 1
Hospital Requirements
- Hospitals must provide necessary resources to implement NIHSS
- All stroke team members should be trained in NIHSS assessment
- Documentation of scores should be standardized 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Underestimating posterior circulation strokes: Don't withhold treatment based solely on low NIHSS scores in suspected posterior circulation strokes 3
Relying only on total score: Consider the pattern of deficits, as different symptom profiles with identical scores may have different outcomes 4
Incomplete assessment: The original NIHSS doesn't test distal upper extremity weakness, which is common in stroke patients - consider adding finger extension assessment 1
Delayed reassessment: Second assessments serve as important rechecks and may be more accurate as patients stabilize 1
The NIHSS has become an indispensable tool in acute stroke management, providing critical information for treatment decisions and outcome predictions that directly impact patient morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.