Is Zephyr effective for treating Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Effectiveness of Zephyr Endobronchial Valves for COPD Treatment

Zephyr endobronchial valves are effective for treating severe emphysema in COPD patients with little to no collateral ventilation, providing clinically meaningful improvements in lung function, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life. 1

Patient Selection Criteria

Zephyr valves should be considered for patients with:

  • Severe emphysema (heterogeneous or homogeneous) 1, 2
  • Hyperinflation with residual volume >175% of predicted 3
  • FEV1 <50% of predicted 3
  • 6-minute walking distance >100 meters 3
  • Little to no collateral ventilation in the target lobe 1

Clinical Benefits

The LIBERATE trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial, demonstrated significant improvements at 12 months with Zephyr valves compared to standard of care:

  • 47.7% of Zephyr valve patients achieved ≥15% improvement in FEV1 (vs 16.8% in standard care) 1
  • Increased FEV1 by 0.106 L 1
  • Improved 6-minute walk distance by +39.31 meters 1
  • Reduced St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score by -7.05 points 1
  • Reduced residual volume by -522 ml 1
  • Improved modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale by -0.8 points 1
  • Improved BODE index by -1.2 points 1

Similar benefits were observed in patients with homogeneous emphysema in the IMPACT trial, with improvements maintained at 12 months 2.

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Patients treated with Zephyr valves experience significant improvements in:

  • Multidimensional measures of dyspnea (TDI focal score) 4
  • Activity levels (SGRQ activity domain, CAT activities) 4
  • Quality of life measures (SGRQ impacts domain, CAT confidence and energy) 4
  • Breathlessness during activities 4

Safety Considerations

The most common serious adverse event is pneumothorax, occurring in approximately 26.6% of patients, typically within the first 2 days after the procedure 1, 3. Other potential complications include:

  • COPD exacerbations 5
  • Pneumonia 5

Position in COPD Treatment Algorithm

According to the GOLD guidelines, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with valves should be considered for:

  • Patients with advanced emphysema refractory to optimized medical care 6
  • Patients with heterogeneous or homogeneous emphysema and significant hyperinflation 6
  • Patients without collateral ventilation 6

The GOLD guidelines state: "In selected patients with heterogeneous or homogenous emphysema and significant hyperinflation refractory to optimized medical care, surgical or bronchoscopic modes of lung volume reduction (e.g., endobronchial one-way valves or lung coils) may be considered." 6

Exclusion Criteria

Patients should be excluded from Zephyr valve treatment if they have:

  • Repeated infectious complications 3
  • Severe bronchiectasis 3
  • Unstable cardiovascular comorbidities 3

Procedural Considerations

  • The procedure may be performed under conscious sedation or general anesthesia 3
  • Chartis assessment (to confirm absence of collateral ventilation) and valve placement should ideally be performed in one procedure 3
  • If atelectasis has not occurred by 1 month after the procedure, valve position should be evaluated and potentially adjusted 3

Conclusion

For appropriately selected COPD patients with severe emphysema and little to no collateral ventilation, Zephyr endobronchial valves provide a clinically effective bronchoscopic lung volume reduction option that significantly improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life with an acceptable safety profile.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.