Can an IGE Alpha-gal result of 0.13 kU/L and negative specific IgE tests for pork, beef, and lamb be considered a negative result for a significant allergic reaction to these foods in a six-year-old male?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Alpha-Gal IgE Level of 0.13 kU/L Can Be Considered Negative

Yes, an alpha-gal IgE level of 0.13 kU/L with negative specific IgE tests for pork, beef, and lamb can be considered a negative result for alpha-gal syndrome in this six-year-old male. 1

Understanding Alpha-Gal IgE Levels and Clinical Significance

Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) is a clinical diagnosis that requires both supporting laboratory findings and consistent symptoms. When interpreting alpha-gal IgE levels:

  • A positive alpha-gal IgE test alone is insufficient to establish a diagnosis of alpha-gal syndrome 1
  • The cutoff value above which there is a 95% probability of meat allergy is >5.5 kU/L 2
  • The value giving the best classification for alpha-gal allergy is 2.00 kU/L 2

In this case, the child's level of 0.13 kU/L falls well below these established thresholds, and all specific meat tests are negative.

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Laboratory results assessment:

    • Alpha-gal IgE: 0.13 kU/L (significantly below diagnostic threshold)
    • Specific IgE tests: Negative for pork, beef, and lamb
    • Conclusion: Negative for alpha-gal sensitization
  2. Clinical correlation:

    • If the child has been consuming mammalian meat without symptoms:
      • Continue regular diet
      • No dietary restrictions needed
    • If the child has had symptoms despite negative testing:
      • Consider other food allergies or GI conditions
      • Consult with allergist if symptoms persist

Important Considerations

  • Alpha-gal syndrome typically presents with delayed symptoms (3-6 hours after meat consumption) 3
  • Common symptoms include urticaria, abdominal pain, nausea, and occasionally anaphylaxis 4
  • A significant proportion of people with positive alpha-gal IgE remain asymptomatic to meat ingestion 1

Monitoring Recommendations

  • No specific follow-up testing is required given the negative result
  • If clinical suspicion remains high despite negative testing (e.g., history of tick bites and consistent symptoms after mammalian meat consumption):
    • Consider repeat testing in 6-12 months, especially if there are new tick exposures 1
    • Monitor for development of symptoms after mammalian meat consumption

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don't assume that all GI symptoms in children from tick-endemic areas are due to alpha-gal syndrome
  • Remember that alpha-gal sensitization can fluctuate over time, especially with additional tick exposures 1
  • Don't overlook other common causes of GI symptoms in children when alpha-gal testing is negative

This negative result provides reassurance that the child's symptoms (if any) are unlikely to be related to alpha-gal syndrome, and mammalian meat products can be safely included in the diet.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Predictive values of alpha-gal IgE levels and alpha-gal IgE: Total IgE ratio and oral food challenge-proven meat allergy in a population with a high prevalence of reported red meat allergy.

Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2018

Research

The alpha-gal story: lessons learned from connecting the dots.

The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2015

Research

Alpha-gal syndrome: A review for the dermatologist.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.