Are there health benefits to using inversion tables for back pain?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 11, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Inversion Tables for Back Pain: Limited Benefits and Potential Risks

Inversion tables have not been proven effective for back pain treatment and carry potential risks including increased intracranial pressure and cardiovascular effects, making them an intervention that cannot be recommended based on current evidence.

Evidence Assessment for Inversion Tables

Lack of Support in Clinical Guidelines

The American College of Physicians (ACP) and American Pain Society (APS) clinical practice guidelines do not include inversion therapy among recommended interventions for either acute or chronic low back pain 1. These comprehensive guidelines thoroughly evaluate various non-pharmacologic interventions but do not mention inversion tables as an evidence-based treatment option.

Physiological Effects and Potential Risks

Inversion therapy has several documented physiological effects:

  • Increased intracranial pressure: Significant changes in optic nerve sheath diameter (a surrogate marker for intracranial pressure) occur during inversion 2
  • Cardiovascular effects: Average increases of 17.2 mmHg systolic and 16.4 mmHg diastolic blood pressure during inversion, with an average decrease in heart rate of 16.4 beats per minute 3
  • Serious adverse events: The FDA Medical Device Reporting Events Database has documented serious injuries including spinal cord injuries, fractures, lacerations, and even death associated with inversion table therapy 4

Limited Potential Benefits

Some studies suggest:

  • Distraction of lumbar intervertebral spaces (0.3 to 4.0 mm) during inversion 3
  • Possible reduction in neuromuscular tension (28.3% reduction compared to 7.1% after control rest) 5
  • Self-reported improvement in low back symptoms in some patients 3

Comparison to Evidence-Based Alternatives

For patients seeking non-pharmacologic treatments for back pain, the ACP/APS guidelines recommend several interventions with stronger evidence:

For Acute Low Back Pain:

  • Spinal manipulation (small to moderate short-term benefits) 1
  • Self-care education 1

For Chronic Low Back Pain:

  • Exercise therapy (particularly individualized, supervised programs with stretching and strengthening) 1
  • Yoga (particularly Viniyoga style) 1
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy 1
  • Acupuncture 1
  • Massage therapy 1
  • Progressive relaxation 1
  • Intensive interdisciplinary rehabilitation 1

Safety Considerations and Contraindications

Inversion tables should be avoided in patients with:

  • History of elevated intracranial pressure 2
  • Cardiovascular conditions (due to blood pressure effects) 3
  • Glaucoma or other eye conditions 3
  • Risk factors for falls or poor balance 6

Clinical Decision Algorithm

  1. Assess patient's back pain type and duration:

    • Acute (<4 weeks), subacute (4-12 weeks), or chronic (>12 weeks)
  2. Consider evidence-based treatments first:

    • For acute pain: self-care, spinal manipulation
    • For chronic pain: exercise, yoga, acupuncture, cognitive-behavioral therapy
  3. If patient inquires specifically about inversion therapy:

    • Explain limited evidence for effectiveness
    • Discuss potential cardiovascular and neurological risks
    • Screen for contraindications (hypertension, glaucoma, heart disease)
    • Recommend safer, evidence-based alternatives with proven benefits

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Unsupervised use: If a patient insists on trying inversion therapy, emphasize that it should only be used under medical supervision 3
  • Extended inversion: Limiting inversion to brief periods (less than 2-3 minutes) may reduce cardiovascular risks 5
  • Relying solely on passive treatments: Emphasize that active interventions like exercise have stronger evidence for long-term benefits 1
  • Fall risk: Ensure proper setup and supervision to prevent devastating injuries like cervical spinal cord injury 6

In conclusion, while inversion tables may provide temporary symptom relief for some patients through spinal distraction, the lack of supporting evidence in clinical guidelines, combined with documented risks, suggests that other evidence-based interventions should be prioritized for back pain management.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Inversion devices: their role in producing lumbar distraction.

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1985

Research

Recommendations for inversion table therapy.

Disability and rehabilitation, 2023

Research

Vagotonic effect of inversion therapy upon resting neuromuscular tension.

American journal of physical medicine, 1985

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.