Are last year's COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) tests effective against the new strain of the virus?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

COVID-19 Tests and New Variants: Effectiveness of Last Year's Tests

Current COVID-19 tests remain effective for detecting new strains, but monitoring for variant-specific performance changes is essential, particularly for antigen tests that target the nucleocapsid protein. 1

Current Testing Landscape

Types of COVID-19 Tests

  • Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs):

    • RT-PCR remains the gold standard for diagnosis with highest sensitivity 1
    • Target genes include RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), open reading frame (ORF1), Envelope (E), and nucleocapsid (N) genes 1
    • Laboratory-based tests typically have 6-8 hour turnaround time; rapid versions available in 45-60 minutes 1
  • Antigen Tests:

    • Most detect nucleocapsid (N) protein 1
    • Lower sensitivity than NAATs but offer rapid results (15 minutes) 1
    • Optimal performance within first 5 days of symptoms 1
    • High specificity (positive results rarely need confirmation) 1

Performance with New Variants

The IDSA guidelines (2024) specifically address variant concerns:

  1. Antigen Tests and Variants:

    • Most antigen tests detect the nucleocapsid protein, which has less variation than the spike protein 1
    • Performance was only slightly reduced with Omicron-BA.1 variant 1
    • Some tests may have reduced sensitivity with specific variants (e.g., Omicron-BA.2) 1
    • IDSA notes: "As new variants emerge, the performance of Ag tests may change. Therefore, monitoring the performance of Ag tests for diagnosis of new-variant COVID-19 is critical" 1
  2. Molecular Tests (NAATs):

    • Generally more robust against variants due to multiple gene targets 1
    • False negatives can occur due to mutations in the RT-PCR target region 1
    • Remain the preferred option for highest sensitivity 1

Testing Strategy Recommendations

For Symptomatic Individuals:

  1. First Choice: Standard NAAT (laboratory-based or rapid RT-PCR) 1

    • Highest sensitivity to detect infection
    • Preferred when results available within 24 hours
  2. Alternative: Antigen testing 1

    • When NAAT results would be delayed >24 hours
    • Within first 5 days of symptoms for optimal performance
    • Negative results should be confirmed with NAAT if clinical suspicion remains high

Testing Algorithm for New Variants:

  1. For highest accuracy: Use standard NAAT/RT-PCR testing
  2. For rapid results: Antigen testing is acceptable with understanding of limitations
  3. For negative antigen tests: Confirm with NAAT if symptoms are consistent with COVID-19

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

  • False Negatives: Can occur with any test but more common with antigen tests (sensitivity ~89% for symptomatic patients within 5 days) 1

    • Causes include: improper sampling, low viral loads, mutations in target regions 1
  • Timing Matters:

    • Antigen tests perform best within 5 days of symptom onset 1
    • Viral RNA detection decreases 10-20 days after diagnosis 1
  • Variant-Specific Concerns:

    • Some variants may affect test performance, particularly antigen tests targeting specific proteins 1
    • Continuous monitoring of test performance against new variants is necessary 1
  • Alternative Diagnoses:

    • Consider other respiratory viruses if COVID-19 tests are negative 1
    • Multiple testing may be needed if clinical suspicion remains high

The evidence strongly supports that while most current COVID-19 tests remain effective for detecting new variants, ongoing vigilance and monitoring of test performance is essential as the virus continues to evolve.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.