What percentage of neonatal fevers are not due to infection?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Percentage of Neonatal Fevers Not Due to Infection

Approximately 83.6% of neonatal fevers are not due to infection, with only 16.4% of febrile neonates having bacterial infections and even fewer (4.4%) having serious infections like bacteremia or meningitis. 1

Understanding Neonatal Fever Etiology

Fever in neonates (infants less than 28 days old) is a common presentation that requires careful evaluation. While infections are a significant concern, the majority of neonatal fevers have non-infectious causes.

Breakdown of Causes:

  • Non-infectious causes: ~83.6%
  • Infectious causes: ~16.4% 1
    • Serious bacterial infections (bacteremia/meningitis): 4.4%
    • Other bacterial infections (primarily UTIs): 12%

Common Non-Infectious Causes of Neonatal Fever:

  1. Neonatal encephalopathy (birth asphyxia): Up to 32.8% of neonates with encephalopathy may present with fever 2

  2. Prematurity or low birthweight: 34.3% of premature or low birthweight neonates may have fever without infection 2

  3. Maternal intrapartum fever: A significant cause of neonatal fever without infection

    • 6.8% of deliveries involve maternal intrapartum fever
    • Only 0.24% of neonates born to febrile mothers develop early-onset sepsis 3
  4. Dehydration: Particularly in breastfeeding neonates with inadequate intake

  5. Overheating: Due to excessive bundling or environmental factors

Clinical Implications

Risk Stratification:

The Rochester criteria can help identify neonates at low risk for serious bacterial infections with high negative predictive value (93.8%) 4. Low-risk criteria include:

  • Well appearance
  • WBC count 5,000-15,000/mm³
  • Band form count <1,500/mm³
  • Normal urinalysis (<10 WBCs/hpf)
  • C-reactive protein <20 mg/L

Important Considerations:

  • Even in low-risk neonates, approximately 0.8% may have bacterial infections (primarily UTIs) 1
  • Viral infections like herpes simplex virus (HSV) can present with fever alone and should be considered, especially when bacterial cultures are negative 5
  • The prevalence of occult bacteremia in febrile children has decreased in the post-HIB vaccine era to approximately 1.5-2% 2

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Assuming all febrile neonates have infections: This leads to unnecessary antibiotic use and hospitalization

  2. Missing viral etiologies: HSV infection can present with fever alone and has similar incidence to bacterial meningitis in neonates with fever 5

  3. Overlooking non-infectious causes: Conditions like neonatal encephalopathy and prematurity are common causes of fever

  4. Failing to consider maternal factors: Intrapartum maternal fever is common (6.8%) but rarely results in neonatal sepsis (0.24%) 3

  5. Relying solely on laboratory values: Clinical appearance and risk factors should guide management alongside laboratory findings

While the majority of neonatal fevers are not due to infection, the consequences of missing a serious bacterial infection are significant. Therefore, a thorough evaluation is warranted in all febrile neonates, with management decisions based on risk stratification criteria and clinical judgment.

References

Research

Identification of febrile neonates unlikely to have bacterial infections.

The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 1997

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Incidence of fever in labor and risk of neonatal sepsis.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.