Workup for Gastrointestinal Bleeding
The workup for gastrointestinal bleeding should follow a structured approach based on hemodynamic stability, with initial stratification into unstable (shock index >1) or stable bleeding, followed by categorization of stable bleeds as major or minor using validated tools like the Oakland score.1
Initial Assessment and Stabilization
Hemodynamic Assessment
- Calculate shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure)
- Shock index >1 indicates unstable bleeding requiring immediate intervention
- Stable patients should be further categorized using the Oakland score
Immediate Actions for Unstable Patients
- Establish large-bore IV access
- Rapid fluid resuscitation with crystalloids
- Blood transfusion if hemoglobin <7 g/dL (or <8 g/dL in patients with cardiovascular disease)
- Correction of coagulopathy (INR >1.5) with fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K
- Correction of thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) with platelet transfusion
Diagnostic Pathway for Unstable Patients
CT angiography (CTA) as first-line investigation for hemodynamically unstable patients
- Provides fastest and least invasive means to localize bleeding source 1
- Should be performed immediately after initial resuscitation
Upper endoscopy if CTA is negative
- Up to 15% of patients with serious hematochezia have an upper GI source 1
- Should be performed immediately if no source identified on CTA
Catheter angiography with embolization if active bleeding is identified on CTA
- Should be performed within 60 minutes for unstable patients 1
Workup for Stable Patients
Risk Stratification Using Oakland Score
- Components include: age, gender, previous LGIB admission, digital rectal exam findings, vital signs, and hemoglobin level
- Score ≤8 points: Minor bleed suitable for outpatient management
- Score >8 points: Major bleed requiring hospital admission 1
For Minor Bleeds (Oakland score ≤8)
- Discharge for urgent outpatient investigation
- Outpatient colonoscopy within 2 weeks, especially for patients >50 years with rectal bleeding 1
- Assessment of anal canal and rectum using rigid sigmoidoscopy, proctoscopy, or flexible endoscopy
For Major Bleeds (Oakland score >8)
- Hospital admission for colonoscopy
- Colonoscopy should be performed within 24 hours of presentation for patients with evidence of ongoing bleeding 1
Special Considerations
Upper vs Lower GI Bleeding Source
- Digital rectal examination is essential to confirm the presence of blood and assess for anorectal pathology
- Consider upper GI source even in suspected lower GI bleeding:
- Up to 15% of patients with hematochezia have an upper GI source 1
- Upper endoscopy should be performed if no clear source is identified in lower GI tract
Anticoagulation Management
- Interrupt warfarin therapy at presentation 1
- Reverse anticoagulation with prothrombin complex concentrate in unstable hemorrhage
- Decisions about restarting anticoagulation should be individualized based on thrombotic risk
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Failure to recognize upper GI source in presumed lower GI bleeding
- Always consider upper endoscopy if no clear lower source is identified
Premature surgical intervention
- No patient should proceed to emergency laparotomy without attempts to localize bleeding by radiological and/or endoscopic modalities 1
Excessive fluid resuscitation
- Over-expansion may exacerbate portal pressure and increase risk of further bleeding 1
- Target restoration of hemodynamic status while avoiding fluid overload
Inappropriate discharge of patients
- Ensure proper risk stratification using validated tools before considering outpatient management
Delayed endoscopic intervention
- Patients with high-risk features or ongoing bleeding should undergo urgent colonoscopy within 24 hours 1