What labs are needed to rule out Lyme disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Laboratory Testing for Lyme Disease

To rule out Lyme disease, a two-tiered serologic testing approach is recommended, consisting of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunofluorescence assay (IFA) as the first tier, followed by a Western immunoblot test if the first test is positive or equivocal. 1

Two-Tiered Testing Algorithm

First Tier Testing

  • ELISA or IFA: These tests measure the overall antibody response (IgM and IgG) to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens
    • Most laboratories use whole-cell sonicate preparation of B. burgdorferi
    • Newer EIAs using specific antigens like VlsE lipoprotein or C6 peptide are also FDA-cleared and offer higher specificity 1
    • If the result is negative, no further testing is needed
    • If the result is positive or equivocal, proceed to second tier testing

Second Tier Testing

  • Western Immunoblot: This confirmatory test detects antibodies against specific B. burgdorferi proteins
    • IgM Western blot: Useful in early infection (first 30 days)
    • IgG Western blot: More reliable for later stages of infection
    • Interpretation follows standardized criteria established at the 1994 Second National Conference on the Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease 1

Timing Considerations

The timing of testing is crucial for accurate results:

  • Early localized disease (within 30 days of tick bite):

    • Serologic testing has low sensitivity (20-50%)
    • Patients with erythema migrans (EM) rash in endemic areas can be diagnosed clinically without laboratory testing 1
  • Early disseminated disease (weeks after infection):

    • Sensitivity of two-tiered testing improves to approximately 70-80% 1
    • IgM antibodies typically appear first, followed by IgG
  • Late disseminated disease (months after infection):

    • Sensitivity of two-tiered testing reaches 90-100% 1
    • IgG antibodies should be present; isolated IgM positivity is likely false positive

Important Caveats

  1. False negatives: Early antibiotic treatment can blunt or prevent antibody response 1

  2. False positives: Can occur with other conditions including:

    • Syphilis
    • Infectious mononucleosis (EBV/CMV)
    • Autoimmune disorders
    • Other spirochetal infections 1
  3. Persistent antibodies: Antibodies often persist for months or years after successfully treated infection, so seroreactivity alone cannot be used as a marker of active disease 1

  4. Limitations of other testing methods:

    • PCR testing of blood, CSF, or synovial fluid has not been standardized for routine diagnosis 1
    • Culture of B. burgdorferi requires special media and extended observation, limiting clinical utility 1

Special Considerations

  • For suspected neuroborreliosis, paired serum and CSF antibody testing may be helpful
  • Newer testing approaches using multiple recombinant antigens or peptide-based ELISAs may improve diagnostic accuracy, but the standard two-tiered approach remains the recommended method 1
  • IgA testing is not routinely recommended as there are insufficient data to demonstrate its clinical utility 1

Remember that laboratory results should always be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical presentation, exposure history, and epidemiological risk factors.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.