What are the different triage categories in a clinical setting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Clinical Triage Categories

Triage categories in clinical settings are standardized systems that prioritize patients based on the severity of their condition to ensure those with the most urgent medical needs receive timely care. The most widely accepted triage systems use five levels to categorize patients according to acuity and urgency of care required 1.

Standard Five-Level Triage Systems

Four internationally recognized five-level triage systems are currently in use:

  1. Australasian Triage Scale (ATS)

    • Categorizes patients based on symptoms using specific descriptors
    • Focuses on symptom presentation and physiological parameters
  2. Manchester Triage System (MTS)

    • Uses defined presentational flow charts combined with clinical indicators
    • Structured approach with specific pathways for different presenting complaints
  3. Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)

    • Based on the ATS but also incorporates diagnoses
    • Combines physiological parameters with clinical presentations
  4. Emergency Severity Index (ESI)

    • First excludes life-threatening and severe conditions
    • Then stratifies remaining patients according to estimated resource utilization
    • Two-step approach focusing on both acuity and resource needs

Common Triage Categories

The five standard levels used in most emergency department triage systems are:

  1. Level 1 (Red) - Resuscitation/Immediate

    • Life-threatening conditions requiring immediate intervention
    • Examples: cardiac arrest, severe trauma, respiratory failure
    • Time to physician: Immediate
  2. Level 2 (Orange) - Emergent/Very Urgent

    • High-risk conditions that could rapidly deteriorate
    • Severe pain or distress
    • Time to physician: Within 10-15 minutes
  3. Level 3 (Yellow) - Urgent

    • Conditions requiring treatment but with stable vital signs
    • Moderate pain or distress
    • Time to physician: Within 30-60 minutes
  4. Level 4 (Green) - Semi-urgent/Standard

    • Minor injuries or illnesses
    • Minimal pain or distress
    • Time to physician: Within 1-2 hours
  5. Level 5 (Blue) - Non-urgent

    • Minor conditions that could be treated in primary care settings
    • Chronic or minor acute conditions
    • Time to physician: Within 2-4 hours

Mass Casualty Triage Systems

During mass casualty incidents, specialized triage systems are employed:

  1. START (Simple Triage And Rapid Treatment)

    • Categorizes patients into four groups: Immediate (red), Delayed (yellow), Minor (green), and Deceased/Expectant (black)
    • Based on ability to walk, respiratory rate, perfusion, and mental status 2
  2. SALT (Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treatment/Transport)

    • More recent system with similar categories to START
    • Includes early lifesaving interventions during the triage process 2

Critical Care Triage During Disasters

During disasters or pandemics when resources are limited, specialized critical care triage protocols may be implemented:

  • Uses exclusion criteria to determine ICU admission eligibility 3
  • Employs scoring systems like SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) to prioritize patients 3
  • Considers factors such as likelihood of survival and resource requirements

Implementation Considerations

When implementing triage systems:

  • Regular training of triage nurses is essential to minimize under-triage, which poses a significant risk to patient safety 4
  • Under-triage rates should ideally be kept below 5-10% to ensure patient safety 4
  • Over-triage (assigning higher acuity than needed) is less dangerous but wastes resources

Pitfalls and Limitations

Important considerations when using triage systems:

  • Triage accuracy varies significantly between providers and systems 5
  • Neither START nor SALT has demonstrated high sensitivity or specificity for predicting clinical outcomes in some studies 2
  • Triage decisions should be periodically reassessed as patient conditions can change rapidly
  • Special populations (pediatric, geriatric, pregnant) may require modified triage approaches
  • Cultural and language barriers can affect accurate triage assessment

Effective triage is fundamental to emergency department operations and directly impacts patient outcomes by ensuring timely care based on clinical need rather than arrival time.

References

Research

[Triage systems in the emergency department].

Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2012

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The implementation of the South African Triage Score (SATS) in an urban teaching hospital, Ghana.

African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.