What is the most effective method to decrease the zone of stasis in a patient with an electrical injury?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Controlling Temperature is Most Effective for Decreasing the Zone of Stasis in Electrical Burns

Controlling temperature by cooling thermal burns with cold (15° to 25°C) tap water as soon as possible is the most effective method to decrease the zone of stasis in electrical burn injuries. 1

Understanding Electrical Burns and the Zone of Stasis

Electrical burns create three concentric zones of tissue damage:

  • Zone of coagulation (central, irreversible damage)
  • Zone of stasis (surrounding area with compromised blood flow)
  • Zone of hyperemia (outermost area with increased blood flow)

The zone of stasis is critical because it contains initially viable cells that may die within 24-48 hours if not properly treated, leading to burn wound progression and deeper injury.

Evidence-Based Management of Electrical Burns

Temperature Control (First-Line Intervention)

The 2010 American Heart Association guidelines specifically recommend:

  • Cool thermal burns with cold (15° to 25°C) tap water as soon as possible
  • Continue cooling until pain is relieved
  • Avoid applying ice directly to burns as it can produce tissue ischemia 1

Temperature control through appropriate cooling:

  • Reduces pain and edema
  • Decreases depth of injury
  • Speeds healing
  • May reduce need for excision and grafting of deep burns 1

Important Cautions with Cooling

  • Don't use ice directly on burns (Class III, LOE B) 1
  • Avoid prolonged cold exposure to small burns
  • Avoid even brief cold exposure if the burn is large
  • Both prolonged and brief inappropriate cooling can cause further tissue injury and hypothermia 1

Other Interventions for Zone of Stasis

While temperature control is primary, research has explored additional interventions:

  1. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): A 2018 study showed oral NAC significantly decreased tissue destruction in electrical burns by reducing the necrotic area and tissue damage 2

  2. Subatmospheric pressure therapy: Application of negative pressure (125 mmHg) within 12 hours of injury has shown promise in preventing progression of the zone of stasis 3

  3. Glutathione: Has demonstrated effectiveness in saving the zone of stasis through its antioxidant properties 4

Complete Management of Electrical Burns

After ensuring scene safety and turning off the power source:

  1. Apply cold water (15-25°C) to the burn area
  2. Assess for associated injuries (cardiac arrhythmias, respiratory arrest)
  3. Maintain spinal motion restriction if trauma is suspected
  4. Provide rapid IV fluid administration for significant tissue destruction
  5. Ensure all victims receive medical assessment as extent of injury may not be apparent 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Touching the victim while power is still on
  • Using ice directly on burns
  • Failing to recognize the potential for deep tissue damage despite minimal external signs
  • Underestimating fluid requirements in electrical burns
  • Delaying cooling intervention beyond the critical window for saving the zone of stasis

Remember that electrical burns often cause more extensive internal damage than is visible on the surface, and all electrical burn victims require thorough medical evaluation.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

The effect of oral N-acetylcystein on prevention of extensive tissue destruction in electrical burn injury.

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2018

Research

Saving the zone of stasis: is glutathione effective?

Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.