HSV-2 IgG Index Values Can Fluctuate Between High and Low
Yes, HSV-2 IgG index values can fluctuate from high to low in subsequent tests, as commercial type-specific glycoprotein G HSV-2 antibody assays have significant limitations in reliability and consistency. 1
Understanding HSV-2 Antibody Test Variability
HSV-2 serologic tests measure antibodies to HSV glycoprotein G-2 (gG-2) using various methods:
- Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)
- Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA)
- Western blot/immunoblot (gold standard)
Factors Contributing to Index Value Fluctuations:
Test Variability: Commercial tests show inherent variability between testing runs 2
Antibody Dynamics:
Antibody Avidity:
- Antibody binding strength varies over time
- Lower avidity may contribute to lower index values in established infections 2
Test Performance Limitations:
Clinical Implications of Fluctuating Index Values
Diagnostic Challenges:
- A single negative or low-positive test cannot definitively rule out HSV-2 infection
- Index values between 1.1-2.9 have particularly poor specificity (only 39.8%) 1
- Values ≥3.0 have better but still imperfect specificity (78.6%) 1
Recommended Testing Approach:
For suspected recent infection:
- Wait at least 12 weeks after potential exposure before testing to avoid false negatives during the "window period" 1
For low-positive results (index value <3.0):
For established infections with fluctuating results:
Pitfalls to Avoid
Relying on a single test result: Given the documented fluctuations, multiple tests may be necessary for accurate diagnosis 3
Misinterpreting low index values: Low values don't necessarily indicate recent infection or seroreversion 2
Using IgM testing: IgM detection is a poor indicator of recent infection as approximately one-third of patients with recurrent genital herpes have IgM responses 1
Overinterpreting negative results: False-negative results occur in up to 30% of patients with active HSV-2 infections 3
For accurate diagnosis, consider the clinical presentation alongside serologic testing, and when possible, direct detection methods like PCR from lesions provide more definitive diagnosis during active outbreaks 1.