Can Herpes Simplex Virus 2 (HSV 2) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) test results fluctuate from a high index to a low index?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HSV-2 IgG Index Values Can Fluctuate Between High and Low

Yes, HSV-2 IgG index values can fluctuate from high to low in subsequent tests, as commercial type-specific glycoprotein G HSV-2 antibody assays have significant limitations in reliability and consistency. 1

Understanding HSV-2 Antibody Test Variability

HSV-2 serologic tests measure antibodies to HSV glycoprotein G-2 (gG-2) using various methods:

  • Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)
  • Chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA)
  • Western blot/immunoblot (gold standard)

Factors Contributing to Index Value Fluctuations:

  1. Test Variability: Commercial tests show inherent variability between testing runs 2

  2. Antibody Dynamics:

    • Index values typically rise after infection, peaking around 9-10 weeks post-infection
    • In established infections (even years old), 22% of patients still show at least one low index value 2
    • Some patients experience transient seroreversions where values temporarily drop below positive thresholds 2
  3. Antibody Avidity:

    • Antibody binding strength varies over time
    • Lower avidity may contribute to lower index values in established infections 2
  4. Test Performance Limitations:

    • False-negative rates of 12-30% occur in patients with recurrent HSV-2 DNA-positive genital lesions 3
    • Even among the best commercial tests, sensitivity and specificity are imperfect 4

Clinical Implications of Fluctuating Index Values

Diagnostic Challenges:

  • A single negative or low-positive test cannot definitively rule out HSV-2 infection
  • Index values between 1.1-2.9 have particularly poor specificity (only 39.8%) 1
  • Values ≥3.0 have better but still imperfect specificity (78.6%) 1

Recommended Testing Approach:

  1. For suspected recent infection:

    • Wait at least 12 weeks after potential exposure before testing to avoid false negatives during the "window period" 1
  2. For low-positive results (index value <3.0):

    • Confirm with a second assay using a different gG antigen 1
    • Consider supplemental testing with Biokit HSV-2 rapid assay or Western blot 1
  3. For established infections with fluctuating results:

    • Consider that even long-standing infections can show variable antibody levels 2
    • Multiple testing may be necessary for accurate diagnosis 3

Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Relying on a single test result: Given the documented fluctuations, multiple tests may be necessary for accurate diagnosis 3

  2. Misinterpreting low index values: Low values don't necessarily indicate recent infection or seroreversion 2

  3. Using IgM testing: IgM detection is a poor indicator of recent infection as approximately one-third of patients with recurrent genital herpes have IgM responses 1

  4. Overinterpreting negative results: False-negative results occur in up to 30% of patients with active HSV-2 infections 3

For accurate diagnosis, consider the clinical presentation alongside serologic testing, and when possible, direct detection methods like PCR from lesions provide more definitive diagnosis during active outbreaks 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Clinical correlates of index values in the focus HerpeSelect ELISA for antibodies to herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2).

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.