Recommended Workup for Peptic Ulcer Disease
For patients with suspected peptic ulcer disease, CT scan is the recommended first-line imaging study due to its superior sensitivity in detecting perforation and ability to characterize the site and size of ulcers 1.
Initial Diagnostic Approach
Clinical Assessment
- Evaluate for key symptoms:
Laboratory Studies
- Complete blood count (to assess for leukocytosis)
- Metabolic panel (to detect metabolic acidosis)
- Serum amylase (often elevated with perforation) 1
- Arterial blood gas analysis (strong recommendation based on very low-quality evidence) 1
Risk Stratification
- Apply appropriate scoring systems to predict outcomes:
Imaging Studies
First-Line Imaging
- CT scan (strong recommendation based on low-quality evidence) 1
- Most sensitive for detecting free air
- Can characterize site and size of perforation
- Can exclude other possible causes
- Key findings: pneumoperitoneum, unexplained intraperitoneal fluid, bowel wall thickening, mesenteric fat streaking, extraluminal contrast
Alternative Imaging (if CT unavailable)
- Chest/abdominal X-ray (strong recommendation if CT not promptly available) 1
- Look for free abdominal air (present in 30-85% of perforations)
- Erect and left lateral decubitus views have similar diagnostic accuracy
- Note: Negative X-ray does not rule out perforation
Additional Imaging Techniques
- If free air not seen but suspicion remains high:
- Point-of-care ultrasound may detect free intraperitoneal air but role still being defined 1
Testing for Helicobacter pylori
H. pylori infection is a principal cause of peptic ulcer disease, affecting approximately 42% of patients 2.
Recommended Testing Methods
- Urea breath tests - most accurate for identifying H. pylori 3
- Stool antigen tests - highly accurate and can confirm cure 3
- Serologic tests - convenient but less accurate and cannot confirm cure 3
Endoscopic Evaluation
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the diagnostic technique of choice 4
- Essential for:
- Definitive diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease
- Ruling out malignancy in patients with alarm symptoms or age >55 years 3
- Evaluating complications such as bleeding
- Obtaining biopsies for H. pylori testing
Special Considerations
High-Risk Populations
- Older adults have higher risk of PUD due to:
- Increased use of high-risk medications (antiplatelet drugs, warfarin, SSRIs, bisphosphonates) 3
- Higher risk of complications
Complications Requiring Urgent Evaluation
- Bleeding (73% of patients with complications)
- Perforation (9% of patients with complications)
- Pyloric obstruction (3% of patients with complications) 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on X-rays to rule out perforation (up to 12% of patients with perforations may have normal imaging)
- Failing to test for H. pylori in patients with NSAID use (combined factors increase risk)
- Using serologic tests to confirm H. pylori eradication (not accurate for this purpose)
- Overlooking the possibility of gastric cancer in older patients with new-onset symptoms
By following this systematic diagnostic approach, clinicians can effectively diagnose peptic ulcer disease and its complications, leading to appropriate treatment and improved patient outcomes.