Peptic Ulcer Workup
Initial Diagnostic Approach
For uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease in patients under 55 years without alarm symptoms, use a test-and-treat strategy for H. pylori; all other patients require upper endoscopy to exclude malignancy and confirm diagnosis. 1, 2
Patient Stratification
Low-risk patients (age <55, no alarm symptoms):
- Test for H. pylori using urea breath test or stool antigen test (most accurate methods) 1
- Serologic testing is acceptable but less accurate and cannot confirm eradication 1
- Treat empirically if positive without endoscopy 1, 3
High-risk patients requiring immediate endoscopy:
- Age ≥55 years 1
- Alarm symptoms: weight loss, dysphagia, persistent vomiting, evidence of bleeding (melena, hematemesis), anemia 1, 3
- NSAID users with persistent symptoms 3
- Failed test-and-treat strategy 3
Laboratory Workup
Routine studies include: 4
- Complete blood count (assess for anemia from chronic bleeding) 4
- Blood typing and cross-matching if bleeding suspected 4
- Coagulation studies (INR >1.5 increases mortality risk) 4
- Electrolytes and renal function 4
- Arterial blood gas if perforation suspected 4
Complicated Peptic Ulcer Workup
Suspected Perforation
CT scan is the primary imaging modality with 93-96% sensitivity and 93-100% specificity for detecting perforation. 4, 5
- CT scan is first-line (strong recommendation, 1C) 4
- Look for: pneumoperitoneum, unexplained intraperitoneal fluid, bowel wall thickening, mesenteric fat stranding, extraluminal contrast 5
- Note: 12% of perforations have normal CT findings 6
- Chest/abdominal X-ray only if CT unavailable (detects free air in 30-85% of cases) 4, 5
- Water-soluble contrast study (oral or via NG tube) if free air not seen but suspicion remains (weak recommendation, 2D) 4
- Sudden onset severe abdominal pain (hallmark presentation) 7
- Peritonitis present in only two-thirds of patients—absence does not exclude perforation 7, 5
- Use SOFA or qSOFA scoring to assess severity 4, 5
- Evaluate for sepsis: altered mental status, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, oliguria, hyperlactatemia 4
Suspected Bleeding
Upper endoscopy is the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for bleeding peptic ulcer. 4
Risk stratification: 4
- Glasgow-Blatchford score identifies patients needing transfusion or endoscopy 4
- Rockall score predicts adverse outcomes and mortality 4
When endoscopy unavailable or unsuccessful: 6
- CT angiography (CTA) to localize active bleeding via contrast extravasation 6
- CTA has 95% technical success for subsequent catheter angiography/embolization 6
Resuscitation targets during workup: 4
- Hemoglobin ≥7 g/dL (strong recommendation, 1B) 4
- Mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg 4
- Urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h 4
- Lactate normalization 4
H. pylori Testing Strategy
Preferred diagnostic tests: 1
- Urea breath test (most accurate for active infection) 1
- Stool antigen test (most accurate for active infection) 1
- Both can confirm eradication post-treatment 1
Alternative testing: 1
- Serology (convenient but less accurate, cannot confirm cure) 1
- Endoscopic biopsy with rapid urease test or histology (when endoscopy performed) 1
Etiology Assessment
Primary causes to investigate: 2
- H. pylori infection (42% of cases) 2
- Aspirin/NSAID use (36% of cases) 2
- Both factors together significantly increase perforation and bleeding risk 1
Medication history critical for: 4
- NSAIDs, aspirin, antiplatelet agents 4
- Anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs) 4
- SSRIs, bisphosphonates (increase risk in elderly) 1
- Corticosteroids 4
Common Pitfalls
Avoid these errors: 5
- Relying on physical examination alone—peritonitis absent in one-third of perforations 5
- Delaying CT scan for plain radiography in unstable patients 6
- Using serology to confirm H. pylori eradication (cannot distinguish active from past infection) 1
- Performing endoscopy in suspected perforation before imaging confirmation 4
- Missing malignancy in gastric ulcers—all require endoscopic biopsy and follow-up endoscopy to confirm healing 6, 2