What is the recommended approach for a peptic ulcer workup?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Peptic Ulcer Workup

Initial Diagnostic Approach

For uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease in patients under 55 years without alarm symptoms, use a test-and-treat strategy for H. pylori; all other patients require upper endoscopy to exclude malignancy and confirm diagnosis. 1, 2

Patient Stratification

Low-risk patients (age <55, no alarm symptoms):

  • Test for H. pylori using urea breath test or stool antigen test (most accurate methods) 1
  • Serologic testing is acceptable but less accurate and cannot confirm eradication 1
  • Treat empirically if positive without endoscopy 1, 3

High-risk patients requiring immediate endoscopy:

  • Age ≥55 years 1
  • Alarm symptoms: weight loss, dysphagia, persistent vomiting, evidence of bleeding (melena, hematemesis), anemia 1, 3
  • NSAID users with persistent symptoms 3
  • Failed test-and-treat strategy 3

Laboratory Workup

Routine studies include: 4

  • Complete blood count (assess for anemia from chronic bleeding) 4
  • Blood typing and cross-matching if bleeding suspected 4
  • Coagulation studies (INR >1.5 increases mortality risk) 4
  • Electrolytes and renal function 4
  • Arterial blood gas if perforation suspected 4

Complicated Peptic Ulcer Workup

Suspected Perforation

CT scan is the primary imaging modality with 93-96% sensitivity and 93-100% specificity for detecting perforation. 4, 5

Imaging protocol: 4, 5

  • CT scan is first-line (strong recommendation, 1C) 4
  • Look for: pneumoperitoneum, unexplained intraperitoneal fluid, bowel wall thickening, mesenteric fat stranding, extraluminal contrast 5
  • Note: 12% of perforations have normal CT findings 6
  • Chest/abdominal X-ray only if CT unavailable (detects free air in 30-85% of cases) 4, 5
  • Water-soluble contrast study (oral or via NG tube) if free air not seen but suspicion remains (weak recommendation, 2D) 4

Clinical assessment: 4, 5

  • Sudden onset severe abdominal pain (hallmark presentation) 7
  • Peritonitis present in only two-thirds of patients—absence does not exclude perforation 7, 5
  • Use SOFA or qSOFA scoring to assess severity 4, 5
  • Evaluate for sepsis: altered mental status, tachycardia, tachypnea, hypotension, oliguria, hyperlactatemia 4

Suspected Bleeding

Upper endoscopy is the definitive diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for bleeding peptic ulcer. 4

Risk stratification: 4

  • Glasgow-Blatchford score identifies patients needing transfusion or endoscopy 4
  • Rockall score predicts adverse outcomes and mortality 4

When endoscopy unavailable or unsuccessful: 6

  • CT angiography (CTA) to localize active bleeding via contrast extravasation 6
  • CTA has 95% technical success for subsequent catheter angiography/embolization 6

Resuscitation targets during workup: 4

  • Hemoglobin ≥7 g/dL (strong recommendation, 1B) 4
  • Mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg 4
  • Urine output ≥0.5 mL/kg/h 4
  • Lactate normalization 4

H. pylori Testing Strategy

Preferred diagnostic tests: 1

  • Urea breath test (most accurate for active infection) 1
  • Stool antigen test (most accurate for active infection) 1
  • Both can confirm eradication post-treatment 1

Alternative testing: 1

  • Serology (convenient but less accurate, cannot confirm cure) 1
  • Endoscopic biopsy with rapid urease test or histology (when endoscopy performed) 1

Etiology Assessment

Primary causes to investigate: 2

  • H. pylori infection (42% of cases) 2
  • Aspirin/NSAID use (36% of cases) 2
  • Both factors together significantly increase perforation and bleeding risk 1

Medication history critical for: 4

  • NSAIDs, aspirin, antiplatelet agents 4
  • Anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs) 4
  • SSRIs, bisphosphonates (increase risk in elderly) 1
  • Corticosteroids 4

Common Pitfalls

Avoid these errors: 5

  • Relying on physical examination alone—peritonitis absent in one-third of perforations 5
  • Delaying CT scan for plain radiography in unstable patients 6
  • Using serology to confirm H. pylori eradication (cannot distinguish active from past infection) 1
  • Performing endoscopy in suspected perforation before imaging confirmation 4
  • Missing malignancy in gastric ulcers—all require endoscopic biopsy and follow-up endoscopy to confirm healing 6, 2

References

Research

Peptic ulcer disease.

American family physician, 2007

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Perforated Gastric Ulcers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Duodenal Ulcer Complications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Pain Characteristics in Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.