What is the sensitivity of hematuria for nephrolithiasis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Sensitivity of Hematuria for Nephrolithiasis

  • The sensitivity of hematuria for diagnosing nephrolithiasis varies across studies, with reported values ranging from 77% to 84% 1, 2.
  • A study published in Urology annals found that the sensitivity of microhematuria for diagnosing ureteral stones was 85%, compared to 55% for renal stones only 1.
  • Another study published in Urology found that the sensitivity of hematuria on microscopic urinalysis for renal colic was 84% 2.
  • However, the presence or absence of hematuria cannot be used to reliably determine which patients actually have ureteral stones, as the specificity and negative predictive value are low 1, 2, 3.

Comparison with Other Diagnostic Tools

  • A study published in Scandinavian journal of urology found that a single nephrographic phase CT had a sensitivity of 86% for detecting urinary stones, compared to 77-84% for hematuria 4.
  • Another study published in BJU international found that ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 54% for detecting renal calculi, which is lower than the sensitivity of hematuria 5.
  • The use of noncontrast-enhanced CT scan is considered the gold standard diagnostic tool for nephrolithiasis, and hematuria should not be relied upon as the sole diagnostic criterion 1, 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.