What are the management and treatment options for Brugada syndrome?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management and Treatment of Brugada Syndrome

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the only treatment proven to reduce mortality in high-risk Brugada syndrome patients, and should be recommended for all patients with previous cardiac arrest, documented ventricular tachycardia, or syncope with spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern. 1

Diagnosis and Risk Stratification

Brugada syndrome is diagnosed when a patient presents with:

  • ST-segment elevation with type 1 morphology ≥2 mm in one or more right precordial leads (V1, V2) positioned in the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th intercostal space
  • This pattern may occur spontaneously or after provocative drug testing with sodium channel blockers 1

Risk stratification is critical for determining management:

Risk Category Clinical Features Annual Event Rate
High Risk Previous cardiac arrest or sustained VT 13.5% per year
Intermediate Risk Syncope with spontaneous type 1 ECG 3.2% per year
Low Risk Asymptomatic 1% per year

Treatment Algorithm

1. High-Risk Patients

  • ICD implantation is strongly recommended (Class I) for:
    • Survivors of aborted cardiac arrest
    • Patients with documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia 1
    • Expected meaningful survival >1 year 1

2. Intermediate-Risk Patients

  • ICD implantation should be considered (Class IIa) for:
    • Patients with spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern and history of syncope 1

3. Low-Risk Patients

  • Observation without therapy is recommended (Class I) for:
    • Asymptomatic patients with only inducible type 1 Brugada ECG pattern 1
    • ICD may be considered (Class IIb) in patients who develop VF during programmed ventricular stimulation with 2-3 extrastimuli 1

4. Management of Electrical Storms/Recurrent ICD Shocks

  • Quinidine or isoproterenol should be considered (Class IIa) for:
    • Patients experiencing electrical storms 1
    • Patients with recurrent ICD shocks for polymorphic VT 1

5. Alternative Therapies

  • Quinidine should be considered (Class IIa) for:

    • Patients who qualify for ICD but have contraindications or refuse it
    • Patients requiring treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias 1
  • Catheter ablation may be considered (Class IIb) for:

    • Patients with history of electrical storms
    • Patients with repeated appropriate ICD shocks 1

Lifestyle Modifications

All patients with Brugada syndrome should follow these recommendations:

  • Avoid drugs that may induce ST-segment elevation in right precordial leads (consult www.brugadadrugs.org)
  • Avoid excessive alcohol intake
  • Avoid large meals
  • Promptly treat any fever with antipyretic drugs 1

Special Considerations

ICD Complications

The complication rate with ICDs in Brugada syndrome is significant (28-32%), including:

  • Inappropriate shocks (20-27% of patients) due to lead failure, T-wave oversensing, sinus tachycardia, or SVT 2, 3
  • Lead problems requiring reintervention (10-19%) 2
  • Psychological impact (13.5% requiring psychiatric assistance) 2

Pediatric Patients

In young patients with Brugada syndrome:

  • Spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern and symptoms at diagnosis are strong predictors of life-threatening arrhythmias
  • Fever triggers approximately 27% of life-threatening arrhythmic events
  • Aggressive use of antipyretics is important in prevention 4

Remote Monitoring

Remote ICD monitoring in Brugada syndrome patients can:

  • Decrease outpatient consultations
  • Help prevent inappropriate shocks through early detection of device issues
  • Allow prompt reprogramming when needed 5

Genetic Testing

  • Genetic testing may be useful to facilitate cascade screening of relatives (Class IIb) 1
  • SCN5A mutations account for only about 5% of genotype-positive patients
  • Results of genetic screening do not currently influence prognosis or treatment decisions 1

By following this evidence-based approach to management, clinicians can optimize outcomes for patients with Brugada syndrome while minimizing complications from unnecessary interventions.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Remote implantable cardioverter defibrillator monitoring in a Brugada syndrome population.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.