TOAST Classification for Stroke
The TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) classification divides ischemic stroke into five subtypes based on etiology: 1) large-artery atherosclerosis, 2) cardioembolism, 3) small-vessel occlusion, 4) stroke of other determined etiology, and 5) stroke of undetermined etiology.
TOAST Classification System Details
1. Large-Artery Atherosclerosis
- Clinical features: Cortical, cerebellar, or brainstem dysfunction
- Imaging: Infarct >1.5 cm in diameter
- Diagnostic criteria: >50% stenosis or occlusion of a major brain artery or branch cortical artery
- Supportive evidence: History of claudication, TIAs in same vascular territory, carotid bruits
2. Cardioembolism
- Clinical features: Sudden onset with maximum deficit at beginning
- Imaging: Usually cortical infarcts
- Diagnostic criteria: At least one cardiac source identified (e.g., atrial fibrillation, mechanical valve, recent MI)
- Supportive evidence: Previous TIA/stroke in different vascular territories
3. Small-Vessel Occlusion (Lacunar)
- Clinical features: Lacunar syndrome without cortical dysfunction
- Imaging: Subcortical infarct <1.5 cm in diameter
- Diagnostic criteria: History of diabetes or hypertension
- Exclusion criteria: Potential cardiac or large vessel sources
4. Stroke of Other Determined Etiology
- Clinical features: Variable based on cause
- Diagnostic criteria: Rare causes identified through specific testing (e.g., vasculitis, hypercoagulable states, dissection)
- Exclusion criteria: Common causes ruled out
5. Stroke of Undetermined Etiology
- Includes three subcategories:
- Cryptogenic stroke: No cause identified despite extensive evaluation
- Multiple potential causes identified
- Incomplete evaluation
Clinical Application and Significance
The TOAST classification has significant implications for:
Treatment decisions: Different subtypes may respond differently to specific interventions 1. For example:
- Cardioembolic strokes often require anticoagulation for secondary prevention
- Large-artery atherosclerosis may benefit from antiplatelet therapy and possible revascularization
Prognosis determination: Stroke subtypes have different recurrence rates and outcomes 1
Research applications: Allows for standardized reporting in clinical trials 1
Limitations and Evolutions
Despite being the most widely used classification system, TOAST has some limitations:
- Moderate interrater reliability
- Up to 40% of strokes classified as "undetermined" 1
- Does not account for multiple potential causes
Newer classification systems have been developed to address these limitations:
- Causative Classification System (CCS): Web-based, automated system with improved reliability
- ASCOD Classification: Grades potential causes (Atherosclerosis, Small-vessel disease, Cardiac source, Other cause, Dissection) by degree of likelihood 2
- Chinese Ischemic Stroke Subclassification (CISS): Enhanced accuracy for Asian populations 3
Practical Implementation
When applying TOAST classification in clinical practice:
- Obtain comprehensive vascular imaging (carotid/cerebral vessels)
- Perform cardiac evaluation (echocardiography, rhythm monitoring)
- Assess for hypercoagulable states in younger patients or those without traditional risk factors
- Document certainty level ("probable" vs "possible")
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Incomplete workup: Recent data shows only 61% accuracy in TOAST classification in clinical practice 4
- Premature classification: Ensure adequate diagnostic testing before assigning a subtype
- Ignoring multiple mechanisms: Consider all potential contributing factors
- Overreliance on imaging alone: Clinical features should be integrated with imaging findings
The TOAST classification remains fundamental to stroke medicine despite newer systems, providing a standardized framework for categorizing stroke etiology that guides treatment decisions and research efforts.