Is a 2-second threshold for the RASS (Rapid Assessment of Sonographic sign) sign and a subxiphoid view sufficient to confirm central venous catheter (CVC) placement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Placement: RASS Sign and Subxiphoid View

The current evidence supports a 1-second threshold for the Rapid Atrial Swirl Sign (RASS), not 2 seconds, and while a subxiphoid view is valuable, it should be part of a more comprehensive ultrasound assessment for optimal confirmation of CVC placement. 1

RASS Sign Threshold: 1 Second vs. 2 Seconds

Recent evidence has updated the recommended threshold for RASS:

  • The most recent high-quality study (2024) demonstrated that a 1-second push-to-bubbles time (PTB) threshold for RASS showed 100% sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for detecting CVC malpositions compared to chest X-ray 1
  • This 1-second threshold is more reliable than the previously used 2-second threshold
  • The Society of Hospital Medicine's position statement recommends using ultrasound with rapid infusion of agitated saline to visualize RASS for detecting catheter tip misplacement 2

Ultrasound Views for CVC Confirmation

A subxiphoid view alone is not considered sufficient:

  • Guidelines recommend a structured approach to ultrasound confirmation of CVC placement that includes multiple views 3

  • The six-step approach to ultrasound-guided CVC placement includes:

    1. Identifying anatomy of insertion site
    2. Confirming patency of the vein
    3. Using real-time US guidance for puncture
    4. Confirming needle position in vein
    5. Confirming wire position in vein
    6. Confirming catheter position in vein 3
  • Both short axis (transverse) and long axis (longitudinal) views should be used 3

  • Visualization of the catheter tip is critical to ensure proper placement in the lower superior vena cava or upper right atrium 3

Benefits of Ultrasound Confirmation

  • Ultrasound confirmation allows for immediate use of the catheter without waiting for radiographic confirmation 4
  • LUS (lung ultrasound) can reduce CVC insertion-to-use time and improve patient safety 3
  • Median point-of-care US completion time is 16 minutes compared to 32 minutes for chest radiographs 3
  • Ultrasound is faster than radiography at identifying pneumothorax after CVC insertion 3

Limitations and Caveats

  • RASS may not detect all types of malpositions, particularly those in the left brachiocephalic vein 4
  • Ultrasound assessment requires proper training and expertise 2
  • The Society of Hospital Medicine considers RASS detection an advanced skill requiring specific training 2
  • Contrast-enhanced US has shown limitations in detecting CVC location compared to standard chest radiography 3
  • Chest X-ray remains the gold standard for confirming CVC placement in many clinical scenarios 3

Algorithm for CVC Confirmation

  1. Perform real-time ultrasound guidance during CVC insertion
  2. Confirm catheter position using both short and long axis views
  3. Perform RASS test with agitated saline flush (positive if swirl appears in ≤1 second)
  4. If RASS is positive and no complications are suspected, the catheter may be used immediately
  5. If RASS is negative or uncertain, or complications are suspected, obtain a confirmatory chest X-ray
  6. Always obtain a chest X-ray for final confirmation when using left-sided approaches or in patients with anatomical variants

This approach balances the benefits of immediate ultrasound confirmation with the definitive assessment provided by radiography when needed.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.