What are the treatment options for outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Outpatient Treatment Options for Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

For patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism, outpatient treatment is strongly recommended over hospitalization when appropriate support systems are in place, using direct oral anticoagulants as first-line therapy. 1

Patient Selection for Outpatient Management

Proper risk stratification is essential to identify patients suitable for outpatient PE management:

Risk Assessment Tools

  • Validated clinical risk scores should be used to identify low-risk patients 1:
    • Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class I/II
    • Simplified PESI (sPESI) score of 0
    • Hestia criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Patients meeting any of the following should not be managed as outpatients 1:

  • Hemodynamic instability (HR >110 bpm, SBP <100 mmHg)
  • Oxygen saturation <90% on room air
  • Active bleeding or high bleeding risk
  • Already on full-dose anticoagulation at time of PE
  • Severe pain requiring opiates
  • Medical comorbidities requiring hospitalization
  • Severe renal impairment (CrCl <30 mL/min) or severe liver disease
  • History of HIT within the past year requiring heparin treatment
  • Social factors (inadequate home support, lack of telephone, compliance concerns)

Additional Assessments

  • RV function assessment on CT or echocardiography is not mandatory 1
  • If RV dilation is identified, consider measuring cardiac biomarkers (BNP, NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity troponin) 1
    • Normal values support outpatient management
    • Elevated biomarkers should prompt inpatient admission

Anticoagulation Options

First-Line Therapy

  • Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended over vitamin K antagonists for treatment-phase anticoagulation 1:
    • Apixaban
    • Dabigatran
    • Edoxaban
    • Rivaroxaban

DOACs offer several advantages over traditional therapy:

  • Similar or better efficacy with fewer bleeding events 1
  • Fixed dosing without routine monitoring
  • Fewer drug-drug interactions
  • Immediate onset of action

Specific DOAC Options

Rivaroxaban 2

  • Dosing: 15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once daily
  • No initial parenteral anticoagulation required
  • Take with food for optimal absorption
  • Avoid if CrCl <15 mL/min

Dabigatran 3

  • Dosing: 150 mg twice daily after 5-10 days of parenteral anticoagulation
  • Reduce to 75 mg twice daily if CrCl 30-50 mL/min with concomitant P-gp inhibitors
  • Avoid if CrCl <30 mL/min with P-gp inhibitors

Implementation of Outpatient Care

Key Requirements

  1. Robust pathway for follow-up and monitoring 1
  2. Patient education on medication adherence and warning signs
  3. Access to emergency care if symptoms worsen
  4. Scheduled follow-up within 1-2 weeks

Safety Outcomes

Multiple studies demonstrate the safety of outpatient PE management:

  • Pooled incidence of recurrent VTE at 3 months: 1.7% for outpatients vs 1.2% for inpatients 4
  • Major bleeding at 3 months: 0.97% for outpatients vs 1.0% for inpatients 4
  • All-cause mortality: Similar rates between outpatients and inpatients after adjusting for cancer 4

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Failure to use validated risk assessment tools - Always use PESI, sPESI, or Hestia criteria to identify low-risk patients 1

  2. Overlooking social factors - Ensure patients have adequate home support, telephone access, and ability to return for follow-up 1

  3. Inappropriate DOAC selection - Consider renal function, concomitant medications, and patient-specific factors when selecting anticoagulant 1

  4. Inadequate follow-up - Establish clear follow-up protocols and ensure patients understand warning signs requiring immediate medical attention

  5. Delayed initiation of anticoagulation - Treatment should begin immediately upon diagnosis in suitable patients 1

The evidence strongly supports outpatient management of low-risk PE as safe and effective, with potential benefits including reduced healthcare costs, decreased risk of hospital-acquired conditions, and improved patient satisfaction 5. With proper patient selection and follow-up, outpatient treatment can achieve outcomes at least as good as inpatient management 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Reducing the hospital burden associated with the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2019

Research

Outpatient Treatment of Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.