What to do when a patient is clinically diagnosed with Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV2) but laboratory tests come back negative?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

False Negative HSV2 Test Results in Clinically Diagnosed Patients

When a patient is clinically diagnosed with HSV2 but laboratory tests come back negative, this is most likely due to the limitations of serologic testing, timing of the test, or sampling issues. 1

Reasons for False Negative HSV2 Test Results

Testing Method Limitations

  • PCR testing from active lesions is the gold standard with >90% sensitivity and specificity, but can still miss infections 1
  • Serologic tests have significant limitations:
    • HSV-1 serologic tests have limited sensitivity (~70%) 2, 1
    • HSV-2 serologic tests have high sensitivity (92%) but variable specificity 2
    • False-negative results occur in up to 12-30% of patients with recurrent HSV-1 or HSV-2 DNA positive genital lesions 3

Timing Issues

  • Window period: Serologic testing should not be repeated until at least 12 weeks after exposure to determine if HSV-2 was acquired 2, 1
  • Testing during the healing phase of lesions can yield false negatives 1

Sampling Issues

  • Inadequate sample collection from lesions
  • Improper specimen handling or storage
  • Testing inappropriate sites that don't have active viral shedding 2, 1

Recommended Approach for Discordant Results

Step 1: Evaluate the Clinical Presentation

  • Assess if the clinical presentation is truly consistent with HSV2 (clustered vesicles, painful ulcers, recurrent nature)
  • Consider alternative diagnoses that can mimic genital herpes

Step 2: Determine the Type of Test Used

  • If serologic testing was used, consider the limitations mentioned above
  • If PCR or viral culture was used, evaluate sampling technique and timing

Step 3: Recommended Testing Algorithm

  1. For patients with active lesions:

    • Perform NAAT/PCR testing from the lesion (gold standard) 2, 1, 4
    • If PCR is unavailable, viral culture is an acceptable alternative 2
    • Antigen detection methods (DIF or EIA) can be used if PCR and culture are unavailable 2
  2. For patients without active lesions:

    • Type-specific serologic testing using glycoprotein G assays 2, 1
    • If initial test is negative but clinical suspicion is high:
      • Repeat serologic testing after 12 weeks from suspected exposure 2
      • Consider using a different serologic assay 1
  3. For patients with low positive HSV-2 serologic results (index value <3.0):

    • Confirm with a second test using a different gG antigen 2, 1
    • Biokit HSV-2 rapid assay or Western blot can be used as confirmatory tests 2

Important Caveats

  • Even with index values ≥3.0, false positives have been reported 2, 1
  • Persons with HSV-1 infection are more likely to have false-positive HSV-2 test results with low index values 2
  • Commercial type-specific HSV antibody assays can be false negative in 12-30% of patients with recurrent HSV DNA positive genital lesions 3
  • Using multiple testing methods increases diagnostic accuracy - in one study, 88-90% of patients with recurrent HSV had antibodies detected when using at least one of three different antibody tests 3

Quality Control Considerations

  • Ensure proper internal positive controls and negative controls are used in laboratory testing 2
  • Consider referral to specialized laboratories for Western blot testing in cases where diagnosis remains uncertain despite repeated testing 2, 1

References

Guideline

Herpes Simplex Virus Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.