What is the role of neoadjuvant Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors with or without chemotherapy in patients with Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Neoadjuvant PARP Inhibitors in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer: Role and Efficacy

For patients with HER2-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant PARP inhibitors should be considered primarily for those with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, with talazoparib monotherapy showing the most promising pathological complete response rates of approximately 50% in this population.

Patient Selection for Neoadjuvant PARP Inhibitors

The role of PARP inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting for HER2-negative breast cancer is primarily defined by:

Germline BRCA Status

  • PARP inhibitors are most effective in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
  • These mutations create defects in homologous recombination repair that can be exploited by PARP inhibitors

Disease Characteristics

  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with BRCA mutations show higher response rates
  • Hormone receptor-positive patients with BRCA mutations may also benefit, particularly those with high-risk features

Evidence for Neoadjuvant PARP Inhibitor Use

Single-Agent PARP Inhibition

  • Talazoparib as monotherapy has demonstrated impressive pathological complete response (pCR) rates of nearly 50% in HER2-negative breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations 1
  • Single-agent therapy may offer advantages in terms of reduced toxicity compared to combination approaches

Combination Approaches

  • Recent network meta-analysis suggests that chemotherapy plus olaparib may achieve higher pCR rates (82.5%) in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer 2
  • However, this must be balanced against potentially increased toxicity with combination regimens

Comparative Efficacy of Different Approaches

When comparing different neoadjuvant approaches:

  1. PARP inhibitor monotherapy: Offers significant efficacy in BRCA-mutated patients with potentially fewer adverse events
  2. PARP inhibitor + chemotherapy: May provide higher pCR rates but with increased toxicity
  3. Chemotherapy alone: Remains standard of care for patients without BRCA mutations

Considerations for Clinical Implementation

Toxicity Management

  • Myelosuppression is a common adverse effect of PARP inhibitors
  • Monitoring for anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia is essential
  • Dose interruptions or reductions may be necessary to manage toxicities 3

Long-Term Safety Concerns

  • Risk of myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) with PARP inhibitors
  • Careful monitoring for hematological toxicity is required
  • Discontinue treatment if MDS/AML is confirmed 3

Special Considerations

Triple-Negative vs. Hormone Receptor-Positive Disease

  • PARP inhibitors may be more effective in TNBC with BRCA mutations
  • For hormone receptor-positive disease, higher risk features (e.g., multiple positive lymph nodes) may identify patients most likely to benefit 4

Future Directions

  • Ongoing trials are investigating PARP inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for TNBC
  • Expanding beyond germline BRCA mutations to include somatic BRCA mutations and other homologous recombination defects 5

Practical Algorithm for Decision-Making

  1. Test all HER2-negative breast cancer patients for germline BRCA1/2 mutations
  2. For patients with confirmed germline BRCA1/2 mutations:
    • Consider neoadjuvant talazoparib monotherapy (particularly for TNBC)
    • Alternative: Consider combination of chemotherapy plus PARP inhibitor
  3. For patients without BRCA mutations:
    • Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice
    • Consider clinical trials investigating PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination deficient tumors

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use PARP inhibitors in patients without confirmed BRCA mutations outside of clinical trials
  • Avoid combining PARP inhibitors with platinum agents without careful monitoring due to overlapping toxicities
  • Do not neglect genetic counseling for patients found to have germline BRCA mutations

While the evidence for neoadjuvant PARP inhibitors is still evolving, their role in HER2-negative breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations is promising, particularly as monotherapy or in carefully selected combination approaches.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.