Lacunar Infarcts: Small Vessel Occlusions with Important Clinical Implications
Lacunar infarcts are small subcortical infarcts measuring less than 1.5 cm in diameter on CT or MRI, resulting from occlusion of a single penetrating artery and representing approximately 25% of all ischemic strokes. 1
Definition and Pathophysiology
Lacunar infarcts are characterized by:
- Small subcortical lesions measuring <1.5 cm in diameter on neuroimaging
- Caused by occlusion of a single penetrating artery supplying deep brain structures
- Most commonly affecting the basal ganglia, internal capsule, thalamus, corona radiata, and brainstem
- Primarily associated with cerebral small vessel disease 1, 2
The pathophysiological mechanisms include:
- Lipohyalinosis (degeneration of small vessel walls)
- Microatheroma formation at the origin of penetrating arteries
- Less commonly, embolic occlusion from cardiac or large artery sources 3
Risk Factors
The primary risk factors for lacunar infarcts are:
Clinical Presentation
Lacunar infarcts typically present with one of the classic "lacunar syndromes":
- Pure motor hemiparesis (weakness affecting face, arm, and leg on one side)
- Pure sensory syndrome (numbness/paresthesia on one side)
- Sensorimotor stroke (combined motor and sensory deficits)
- Ataxic hemiparesis (weakness with ipsilateral incoordination)
- Dysarthria-clumsy hand syndrome 2, 5
Unlike cortical strokes, lacunar infarcts typically do not cause:
- Aphasia
- Neglect
- Visual field defects
- Other higher cortical dysfunctions
Diagnosis
Diagnosis of lacunar infarcts requires:
- Clinical presentation with a typical lacunar syndrome
- Neuroimaging (CT or MRI) showing a small (<1.5 cm) subcortical infarct or normal findings
- Exclusion of other potential causes of symptoms 1
MRI is more sensitive than CT for detecting small infarcts, particularly in the brainstem and posterior fossa.
Prognosis and Long-term Outcomes
Lacunar infarcts have a paradoxical clinical course:
- Short-term prognosis: Generally favorable with low early mortality and better functional outcomes at hospital discharge compared to other stroke subtypes 1
- Long-term prognosis: Less favorable with:
According to population studies, patients with small-artery occlusion have the highest survival rate (85% at 2 years) compared to other stroke subtypes, with cardioembolic stroke having the lowest survival rate (55%) 1.
Management and Secondary Prevention
Management of lacunar infarcts includes:
Acute treatment:
- Intravenous thrombolysis if presenting within the treatment window
- Response to thrombolysis appears similar to other ischemic stroke subtypes 4
Secondary prevention:
Clinical Implications
Despite their small size, lacunar infarcts should not be considered benign:
- They represent manifestations of a progressive small vessel disease
- Silent progression of small vessel disease is common
- Cumulative burden of small vessel disease increases risk of cognitive impairment
- Patients require rigorous management and long-term follow-up 2, 7
Common Pitfalls in Management
- Underestimating the long-term risks associated with lacunar infarcts
- Inadequate blood pressure control after lacunar stroke
- Failing to screen for and manage other vascular risk factors
- Not recognizing the increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia
- Overlooking the need for long-term follow-up and monitoring
Lacunar infarcts should be regarded as a potentially serious condition requiring comprehensive evaluation and aggressive management of vascular risk factors to prevent recurrent stroke, cognitive decline, and premature death.