Role of Plasma Exchange in Treating Severe Paraneoplastic Disorders
Plasma exchange should be used as an adjunctive therapy for specific severe paraneoplastic disorders, particularly those with antibody-mediated pathophysiology, but is not recommended as monotherapy. Plasma exchange is most effective when combined with immunosuppressive therapies and when initiated early in the disease course.
Mechanism and Rationale
Plasma exchange (plasmapheresis) works by:
- Mechanically removing circulating antibodies from the bloodstream
- Separating plasma from cellular blood components through membrane filtration or centrifugation
- Reconstituting blood with albumin, fresh-frozen plasma, or crystalloid before reinfusion 1
In paraneoplastic syndromes, plasma exchange targets:
- Circulating pathogenic antibodies
- Complement activation products 1
Evidence-Based Indications for Plasma Exchange
Recommended Uses:
Antibody-Mediated Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes
Severe Vasculitis with Paraneoplastic Features
Not Recommended:
- Routine use for alveolar hemorrhage in ANCA-associated vasculitis 1
- As monotherapy for any paraneoplastic syndrome 1
- For paraneoplastic syndromes with primarily T-cell-mediated pathology (e.g., most anti-Hu syndromes) 1
Treatment Protocol
Typical plasma exchange regimen for paraneoplastic disorders:
- Exchange 1-2 plasma volumes per session
- Sessions performed on alternate days
- 5-14 total procedures depending on clinical response
- Replacement with 5% albumin and/or fresh-frozen plasma 1, 2
Combination Therapy Approach
Plasma exchange should be combined with:
Immunosuppressive medications:
Treatment of underlying malignancy:
- Tumor removal/treatment is critical and carries the best chance of clinical stabilization or remission 3
Efficacy and Response Rates
Response rates vary by syndrome type:
Early initiation of plasma exchange appears more beneficial than delayed treatment 2
Potential Complications
- Hypotensive episodes (most common, ~11% of procedures)
- Cutaneous vasculitis (rare)
- Increased risk of serious infections when combined with immunosuppression 1, 2
- Complications related to vascular access
Key Clinical Considerations
Timing is critical:
- Initiate plasma exchange early in the disease course
- Clinical improvement is unlikely in patients with longstanding symptoms 3
Patient selection:
- Most beneficial in antibody-mediated syndromes
- Less effective in T-cell-mediated paraneoplastic disorders 1
Sequence of therapies:
- Some evidence suggests better outcomes when plasma exchange precedes IVIg rather than follows it 2
Duration of therapy:
- Continue until clinical improvement or stabilization
- Consider additional courses for relapses
Conclusion
Plasma exchange represents an important adjunctive therapy for severe paraneoplastic disorders, particularly those with antibody-mediated pathophysiology. Its efficacy is enhanced when combined with appropriate immunosuppressive therapies and treatment of the underlying malignancy. Early intervention is associated with better outcomes, highlighting the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment initiation.