From the Guidelines
As of my last update, I cannot provide information about 2025 studies since they haven't occurred yet, and the latest available research would be from 2023 or early 2024 at most, with the most recent guideline being the 2024 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations 1. To stay informed about the most current studies in any field, I recommend regularly checking reputable scientific journals, such as Circulation or the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, which have recently published guidelines like the 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery 1.
Key Recommendations for Staying Updated
- Attend conferences and follow research institutions on social media to get real-time updates on new research
- Subscribe to field-specific newsletters or use academic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, or JSTOR to access new publications shortly after peer review
- Utilize email alerts from journals for new publications in areas of interest
- Follow professional associations in the field for summaries of recent important findings, as seen in the 2023 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations 1 This approach ensures access to the most recent and reliable scientific information as it becomes available, which is crucial for making informed decisions based on the latest evidence, such as the studies included in the 2024 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations 1.
From the Research
Latest Studies
There are no studies from 2025 in the provided evidence. However, the most recent study is from 2023, which examined the content and form of original research articles in general major medical journals 2.
Study Findings
- The study found that the use of a subtitle, methods-related items, such as mentioning of methods, clinical context or treatment increased over time (all p < 0.05) 2.
- The use of phrasal titles decreased over time (p = 0.044) 2.
- Not a single NEJM title contained a study name, while the Lancet had the highest usage of it (45%) 2.
- The use of study names increased over time (per year odds ratio: 1.13 (95% CI: [1.03‒1.24]), p = 0.008) 2.
Other Relevant Studies
- A 2021 study discussed Parkinson's disease, its clinical syndrome, causes, and clinical presentations 3.
- A 2017 study compared the prevalence and characteristics of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals, and found that systematic reviews received more citations than narrative reviews (RR = 0.985,95% CI 0.978 to 0.991) 4.
- A 2016 study assessed the adequacy of reporting of non-inferiority trials in major medical journals, and found that reporting and conduct of non-inferiority trials is inconsistent and does not follow the recommendations in available statistical guidelines 5.
- A 2015 study compared the levels of evidence in top medical journals and general pediatric journals, and found that the level of evidence in pediatrics-focused articles within The Lancet was significantly higher than all general pediatric journals (p < 0.05) 6.