Is atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) considered a high-risk breast lesion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia as a High-Risk Breast Lesion

Yes, atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) is definitively considered a high-risk breast lesion that significantly increases the risk of developing breast cancer, with a lifetime risk approximately 4-5 times that of the general population. 1

Risk Profile of ALH

  • ALH is classified as a proliferative lesion with atypia, alongside atypical ductal hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), and flat epithelial atypia 2
  • Women with ALH have a continuous risk of approximately 0.5% to 1.0% per year for developing breast cancer 1
  • The risk affects both breasts, not just the breast where ALH was identified 1
  • ALH behaves similarly to atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) in terms of later breast cancer outcomes, with both showing a 2:1 ratio of ipsilateral to contralateral breast cancer development 3

Clinical Implications

Diagnosis and Assessment

  • When ALH is diagnosed on core needle biopsy, assessment should include:
    • Extent of ALH (number of terminal ductal units involved)
    • Presence of other high-risk lesions
    • Radiologic-pathologic concordance 1

Management Recommendations

  • ALH involving more than 4 terminal ductal units or with radiologic-pathologic discordance requires surgical excision 1
  • Limited ALH (≤3 foci) with radiologic-pathologic concordance can safely be managed by imaging surveillance rather than surgical excision 1, 4, 5
  • The ipsilateral predominance of breast cancer is marked in the first 5 years after diagnosis, consistent with a precursor phenotype for ALH 3

Surveillance Protocol

  • Regular clinical examinations every 6-12 months
  • Annual diagnostic mammography
  • Consider supplemental screening with breast MRI, especially for women with dense breasts 1
  • Surveillance must be bilateral and long-term, as the risk persists for decades 1

Risk Reduction Strategies

  • All women with ALH should be informed about chemoprevention options 1
  • Recommended chemoprevention options include:
    • Tamoxifen for premenopausal women (reduces invasive breast cancer risk by approximately 46%)
    • Raloxifene for postmenopausal women 1
  • A formal individualized education and counseling session can improve chemoprevention acceptance and completion rates 6
  • Bilateral risk-reduction mastectomy may be considered in special circumstances (BRCA1/2 mutations, strong family history, patient preference) 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Overtreatment: Surgical excision is not always necessary for limited ALH (≤3 foci) with radiologic-pathologic concordance 1, 5
  • Inadequate follow-up: The risk of breast cancer persists long-term, requiring consistent surveillance for decades 1
  • Failure to discuss risk reduction options: Chemoprevention can significantly reduce breast cancer risk but is often underutilized 1, 6
  • Treating all atypical lesions the same: Management should be tailored based on extent of ALH and presence of other high-risk factors 1

ALH represents a significant risk factor for future breast cancer development that requires appropriate risk assessment, consideration of surgical excision in specific circumstances, long-term surveillance, and discussion of risk reduction strategies.

References

Guideline

Management of Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.