Management of Hepatitis C: Key Scores and Treatment Considerations
The management of Hepatitis C (HCV) should prioritize treatment based on fibrosis stage, with patients having advanced fibrosis (METAVIR F3-F4) receiving highest priority for direct-acting antiviral therapy to reduce mortality and improve quality of life. 1
Assessment Scores for Liver Fibrosis
Fibrosis Staging Methods
Liver Biopsy
- Still considered the reference standard for assessing inflammation grade and fibrosis stage 1
- Invasive procedure with potential complications
Non-invasive Methods
Transient Elastography (TE)
Serum Biomarker Panels
Combination Approach
- Using APRI and FIB-4 together improves accuracy 2
- May reduce need for liver biopsy or transient elastography in up to 58.5% of patients
Treatment Prioritization
Highest Priority for Treatment 1
Patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis
- METAVIR score F3-F4
- Includes compensated and decompensated cirrhosis
Special populations regardless of fibrosis stage
- Pre- or post-liver transplant patients
- HIV or HBV coinfection
- Significant extrahepatic manifestations (cryoglobulinemia, glomerulonephritis)
- Debilitating fatigue
- High risk of transmission (PWID, MSM with high-risk practices, incarcerated individuals)
Decompensated cirrhosis considerations
- Child-Pugh B and C should receive urgent IFN-free regimens
- MELD score <18-20: can be treated pre-transplant
- MELD score ≥18-20: generally transplant first, then treat HCV post-transplant
- Protease inhibitors contraindicated in Child-Pugh B or C cirrhosis 1
Moderate Priority
- Patients with moderate fibrosis (METAVIR F2)
Individualized Decision-Making
- Patients with minimal/no fibrosis (METAVIR F0-F1) without extrahepatic manifestations
- Consider patient age, willingness for treatment, and comorbidities
Treatment Regimens
Direct-Acting Antivirals (DAAs)
Genotype-specific considerations
- HCV genotype and subtype (1a/1b) must be determined before treatment 1
- Treatment duration and regimen selection based on:
- Genotype
- Prior treatment history
- Presence/absence of cirrhosis
Common DAA combinations
For decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B/C):
- Sofosbuvir + ledipasvir (genotypes 1,4,5,6)
- Sofosbuvir + velpatasvir (all genotypes)
- Sofosbuvir + daclatasvir (all genotypes)
- With ribavirin when possible 1
For compensated liver disease:
- Multiple options including protease inhibitors (e.g., glecaprevir) 5
- Regimen selection based on genotype, treatment history, and comorbidities
Treatment Monitoring
Virologic Response Definitions 1
- Rapid Virological Response (RVR): Undetectable HCV RNA at week 4
- Early Virological Response (EVR): ≥2 log reduction in HCV RNA at week 12
- End of Treatment Response (ETR): Undetectable HCV RNA at end of treatment
- Sustained Virological Response (SVR): Undetectable HCV RNA 12 or 24 weeks after treatment completion
Follow-up Schedule
- Minimum visits at weeks 4 and 12 after treatment initiation
- Then every 12 weeks until end of treatment
- Assessment 12-24 weeks after treatment completion to confirm SVR 1
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
- HBV Reactivation Risk: Screen for HBV before starting HCV treatment 5
- Drug Interactions: Carefully assess potential interactions with DAAs
- Ribavirin Dosing: Weight-based for genotypes 1,4-6 (15 mg/kg/day); flat dose of 800 mg/day for genotypes 2-3 1
- Anemia Management: Monitor hemoglobin in patients on ribavirin
- Renal Function: Sofosbuvir contraindicated in severe renal impairment (GFR <30 mL/min) 1
- Post-SVR Monitoring: Continued surveillance for HCC in patients with advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis even after achieving SVR
By systematically assessing fibrosis stage using appropriate scoring systems and prioritizing treatment for those at highest risk of disease progression, clinicians can optimize outcomes and reduce mortality and morbidity associated with chronic HCV infection.