What are the indications for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) in patients with pneumothorax?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) in Pneumothorax

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) should be considered for pneumothorax patients with persistent air leak after 5-7 days of chest tube drainage, recurrent pneumothorax, or in high-risk occupations requiring the lowest recurrence risk. 1

Primary Indications for VATS in Pneumothorax

VATS is indicated in the following clinical scenarios:

  1. Persistent air leak:

    • Air leak continuing despite 5-7 days of chest tube drainage 1
    • Failure of lung re-expansion despite adequate drainage 1
  2. Recurrent pneumothorax:

    • Second ipsilateral pneumothorax 1
    • First contralateral pneumothorax 1
    • Synchronous bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax 1
  3. Special circumstances:

    • First pneumothorax presentation associated with tension 1
    • First secondary pneumothorax with significant physiological compromise 1
    • Spontaneous hemothorax 1
    • High-risk occupations (pilots, divers) even after a single episode 1
    • Pregnancy 1

Timing of Surgical Intervention

While there is no definitive evidence on the ideal timing for thoracic surgical intervention in cases of persistent air leak, the British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines suggest:

  • Obtain thoracic surgical opinion at 3-5 days of persistent air leak 1
  • Early surgical intervention (within 3 days) in patients with persistent air leak is strongly supported 2
  • Each case should be assessed individually based on clinical merit 1

Surgical Approach Considerations

When VATS is indicated, the following should be considered:

  • Standard approach: VATS with bullectomy (if blebs/bullae present) and pleurodesis 1, 3

  • Recurrence rates:

    • VATS has slightly higher recurrence rates (31/1000) compared to thoracotomy (15/1000) 1
    • For high-risk occupations requiring minimal recurrence risk, thoracotomy may be preferred 1
  • Benefits of VATS over thoracotomy:

    • Shorter hospital stay (3.66 days shorter) 1
    • Reduced postoperative pain and need for analgesia 1, 4
    • Fewer complications (99/1000 vs 138/1000) 1
    • No difference in mortality 1

Patient Selection and Risk Factors

Important considerations for patient selection:

  • Smoking status: Significantly higher recurrence rates in smokers (4.2%) compared to non-smokers (0.2%) after VATS with talc poudrage 5
  • Gender: Male sex may be a risk factor for recurrence in secondary spontaneous pneumothorax 3
  • Surgical technique: Bullae suturing may have higher recurrence rates (3.8%) compared to poudrage alone (0.3%) 5

Clinical Pathway for Management

  1. Initial management:

    • Chest tube drainage is the first-line treatment for most pneumothoraces 1
    • Patients should be hospitalized and stabilized before considering VATS 1
  2. Surgical referral:

    • Obtain thoracic surgical opinion early in the management plan 1
    • Consider VATS if air leak persists after 5-7 days 1
    • Consider earlier VATS in high-risk patients or occupations 1
  3. Non-surgical alternatives:

    • For patients not fit for surgery with persistent air leak, consider autologous blood pleurodesis or endobronchial therapies 1

Potential Pitfalls and Caveats

  • VATS may not be appropriate as primary therapy for all spontaneous pneumothoraces; tube thoracostomy remains the initial treatment of choice 2
  • VATS is associated with longer hospital stays compared to chest tube drainage alone but offers better long-term outcomes with lower recurrence rates 3
  • The absence of contralateral blebs on CT does not reliably predict freedom from contralateral pneumothorax 4
  • While VATS has slightly higher recurrence rates than thoracotomy, the benefits in terms of reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, and fewer complications generally outweigh this risk in most patients 1, 6

In conclusion, VATS represents an effective surgical approach for pneumothorax management, particularly in cases of persistent air leak or recurrence, with benefits of reduced pain and shorter hospitalization compared to traditional thoracotomy, though with slightly higher recurrence rates.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.