What is the appropriate course of action for a pregnant woman with intellectual disability (ID) and an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of 80 who wants to continue her pregnancy, despite her mother's request for an abortion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Respecting Patient Autonomy in Reproductive Decision-Making

The appropriate action is to refuse to perform the abortion (option A) as the patient has expressed her desire to continue the pregnancy and has the capacity to make this decision despite her intellectual disability.

Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity

An IQ of 80 falls within the borderline intellectual functioning range, not moderate or severe intellectual disability. This level of cognitive function generally allows for:

  • Understanding of basic information about pregnancy and childbirth
  • Ability to communicate a choice (which she has clearly done)
  • Appreciation of the situation and its consequences
  • Reasoning about treatment options 1, 2

Ethical and Legal Framework

The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) emphasizes several key ethical principles that apply directly to this case:

  • Respect for autonomy: Clinicians should respect pregnant individuals' autonomy to make decisions that best align with their core values after appropriate counseling 3
  • Informed decision-making: Patients should receive counseling on all management options to ensure they can make an informed decision 3
  • Maternal priority: While maternal medical benefit takes priority when maternal and fetal benefit conflict, the pregnant patient may exercise their autonomy by choosing to prioritize perceived fetal benefit 3

Appropriate Management Approach

  1. Respect the patient's expressed wishes: The patient has clearly communicated her desire to continue the pregnancy, which must be respected as long as she has decision-making capacity 3

  2. Provide appropriate counseling: Ensure the patient receives information about:

    • Maternal and fetal health risks of pregnancy
    • Available support services
    • Strategies to optimize pregnancy outcomes 3
  3. Assess support systems: Evaluate what additional support the patient might need during and after pregnancy, including:

    • Social services referrals
    • Parenting resources for individuals with intellectual disabilities
    • Family support systems 4

Why Other Options Are Inappropriate

  • Option B (Do abortion as patient is not competent): This violates the patient's autonomy. An IQ of 80 does not automatically render someone incompetent to make medical decisions 2, 5

  • Option C (Obtain court order): Seeking a court order to override the patient's wishes would be appropriate only if there was clear evidence the patient lacked decision-making capacity, which is not indicated by an IQ of 80 alone 6

  • Option D (Call child protective services): This would be premature and inappropriate as there is no child yet, and having an intellectual disability does not automatically make someone an unfit parent 4

Important Considerations

  • Avoid reproductive coercion: Healthcare providers must provide balanced information about all options to reduce the likelihood of reproductive coercion 3

  • Support decision-making: Individuals with intellectual disabilities may benefit from decision support tools and clear communication, but this doesn't mean making decisions for them 5

  • Ongoing assessment: Continue to assess the patient's understanding and needs throughout pregnancy to ensure appropriate support is provided 3

The SMFM guidelines clearly state that justice requires providing equitable care to all pregnant individuals and not treating pregnant patients differently simply because they are pregnant 3. This principle extends to not discriminating against patients based on intellectual disability when they demonstrate capacity to make their own reproductive decisions.

References

Research

A clinical primer on intellectual disability.

Translational pediatrics, 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Supporting primary healthcare professionals to care for people with intellectual disability: a research agenda.

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2015

Research

Intellectual Disability and Language Disorder.

Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.