How is the mediastinum measured on a chest X-ray (CXR) and what constitutes a widened mediastinum?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mediastinal Width Measurement on Chest X-Ray and Widened Mediastinum Definition

The most widely used criterion for a widened mediastinum on chest X-ray is a mediastinal width greater than 8 cm on a supine anteroposterior projection, which has high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting thoracic aortic pathology. 1

How to Measure the Mediastinum

Mediastinal width can be measured using several techniques:

  1. Standard Mediastinal Width (MW):

    • Measure the transverse width of the mediastinum at its widest point
    • Normal: <8 cm on supine anteroposterior projection
    • A measurement ≥8 cm is considered widened 1, 2
  2. Left Mediastinal Width (LMW):

    • Measure from the left lateral border of the aortic knob/arch to the left edge of the tracheal air column
    • Normal: <6 cm
    • A measurement ≥6 cm suggests possible aortic pathology 3
  3. Mediastinal Width Ratio (MWR):

    • Calculate the ratio of mediastinal width to chest width at the same level
    • Normal: <0.38 4 or <0.60 3 (different studies use different cutoffs)
    • Higher ratios correlate with increased likelihood of aortic injury
  4. Mediastinal-to-Cardiac (MC) Ratio:

    • Calculate the ratio of mediastinal width to cardiac width
    • Normal: <0.555 2

What Constitutes a Widened Mediastinum

A widened mediastinum is defined by:

  • Quantitative criteria:

    • Mediastinal width >8 cm on supine anteroposterior chest X-ray 1, 5, 2
    • Mediastinal-to-thoracic width ratio >0.25-0.38 2, 4
    • Left mediastinal width ≥6 cm 3
  • Qualitative findings that suggest mediastinal widening:

    • Abnormal aortic contour
    • Loss of the aortic knob definition
    • Left apical cap
    • Depression of the left main bronchus
    • Deviation of an indwelling esophageal tube 1
    • Mediastinal infiltration (irregular, amorphous shape) 1

Clinical Significance and Limitations

  1. For Aortic Dissection/Injury:

    • Sensitivity of widened mediastinum for thoracic aortic disease: 64%
    • Sensitivity of abnormal aortic contour: 71%
    • When all abnormal radiographic findings are included: 90% sensitivity 1
    • Specificity for aortic pathology: 86% 1
  2. For Trauma Patients:

    • The positive predictive value of a widened mediastinum for aortic injury is <1% 5
    • Combined criteria (LMW ≥6 cm and MWR ≥0.60) improve specificity to 66.7% 3
  3. Important limitations:

    • Chest X-ray is inadequately sensitive to definitively exclude aortic dissection except in lowest-risk patients 1
    • In trauma, subjective impression of mediastinal widening by experienced clinicians may be superior to objective measurements 2
    • For trauma patients, chest X-ray is a poor screening test for aortic injury 1

Best Practice Recommendations

  1. Use chest X-ray as an initial screening tool, but recognize its limitations
  2. A completely normal chest X-ray lowers the likelihood of aortic pathology but does not exclude it 1
  3. When mediastinal widening is detected, proceed to more definitive imaging:
    • CT angiography is the preferred next step for suspected thoracic aortic pathology 1
    • For trauma patients with positive findings based on combined LMW and MWR criteria, proceed to CT angiography 3

Remember that while mediastinal measurements are helpful, they cannot replace comprehensive evaluation with advanced imaging when thoracic aortic pathology is suspected.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.