Management of Blast Crisis in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
The recommended management for blast crisis in CML includes induction chemotherapy combined with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) when feasible. 1
Initial Assessment and Classification
Determine blast crisis phenotype (lymphoid vs. myeloid) through:
- Bone marrow examination with flow cytometry
- Cytogenetics and molecular testing for BCR-ABL mutations
- Assessment of extramedullary involvement
Evaluate for CNS involvement:
- Lumbar puncture for CSF analysis
- CNS status classification:
- CNS-1: No blasts in CSF
- CNS-2: <5 blasts/μL in CSF
- CNS-3: ≥5 blasts/μL in CSF
Treatment Algorithm Based on Blast Phenotype
Lymphoid Blast Crisis
Initial Therapy:
- ALL-type induction chemotherapy + TKI 1
- TKI selection based on mutation profile
- Mandatory prophylactic intrathecal therapy
CNS Management:
- For CNS-1/2: Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy per institutional protocol
- For CNS-3: Intensive intrathecal therapy until clearance of blasts
- Consider cranial boost before TBI in conditioning regimen if CNS involvement 1
Response Evaluation:
- Assess for achievement of second chronic phase
- Proceed to HSCT if donor available
Myeloid Blast Crisis
Initial Therapy:
Response Evaluation:
- Follow response parameters used in AML protocols
- Consider second cycle of chemotherapy based on remission status and donor availability
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Donor Search: Begin immediately upon diagnosis of blast crisis
- Matched sibling donor (MSD)
- Matched unrelated donor (MUD) with HLA ≥9/10 match
Timing: Proceed to HSCT ideally within 3 months of achieving second chronic phase 1
If No Donor Available:
- Consider alternative donor sources (haploidentical, cord blood)
- Continue TKI with monthly response evaluation
- Consider experimental treatment concepts
Treatment Considerations and Pitfalls
TKI Selection:
- Second or third-generation TKIs preferred
- Base selection on prior therapy and mutation profile
- Dasatinib has better CNS penetration but still insufficient for CNS disease treatment 1
Common Pitfalls:
- Delayed HSCT: Missing the window of second chronic phase significantly worsens outcomes
- Inadequate CNS prophylaxis: CNS relapse can occur despite systemic control
- Excessive toxicity: Balance between aggressive therapy and treatment-related mortality
Prognosis Factors:
- Achievement of second chronic phase
- Time to transplantation
- Presence of additional chromosomal aberrations
Long-term Outcomes
Despite advances in therapy, blast crisis remains challenging with limited long-term survival. Allogeneic HSCT offers the best chance for cure, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 10% for patients in blast crisis compared to 75% for those in chronic phase 1, 2.
The primary goal is to achieve a second chronic phase and proceed to transplantation as quickly as possible, as remissions are typically short-lived even with potent TKIs 3, 2.