Should patients with type 2 respiratory (resp) failure who are not chronic carbon dioxide (CO2) retainers be placed on scale 2 respiratory support?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Type 2 Respiratory Failure in Non-Chronic CO2 Retainers

Patients with type 2 respiratory failure who are not chronic CO2 retainers should be placed on scale 2 respiratory support, specifically bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), as this is the most appropriate intervention for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in these patients. 1

Understanding Type 2 Respiratory Failure

Type 2 respiratory failure is characterized by:

  • PaCO₂ ≥ 45 mmHg (6 kPa)
  • pH < 7.35
  • Usually accompanied by hypoxemia (PaO₂ < 60 mmHg) 2

Appropriate Respiratory Support Selection

For Non-Chronic CO2 Retainers:

  1. Initial Assessment:

    • Measure arterial blood gases to confirm type 2 respiratory failure
    • Assess respiratory rate and level of consciousness
    • Determine if this is a first presentation or recurrent episode
  2. Oxygen Therapy:

    • Start with controlled oxygen therapy
    • Target SpO₂ of 94-98% (not the lower 88-92% range used for chronic CO₂ retainers) 1
    • Use nasal cannulae at 2-6 L/min or simple face mask at 5-10 L/min 1
  3. Escalation to NIV:

    • If respiratory acidosis persists (pH < 7.35 and PaCO₂ > 45 mmHg) despite maximal medical treatment and appropriate controlled oxygen therapy, initiate BiPAP 1
    • BiPAP is specifically indicated for type 2 respiratory failure in patients who are not chronic CO₂ retainers 1

Evidence-Based Rationale

The British Thoracic Society and NHS guidelines specifically recommend BiPAP for patients with type 2 respiratory failure who are not chronic CO₂ retainers 1. While CPAP is indicated for hypoxemic respiratory failure, BiPAP is the preferred mode for patients with type 2 respiratory failure regardless of whether they have chronic respiratory disease 1.

For patients who are not chronic CO₂ retainers but develop acute hypercapnia:

  • They don't require the lower oxygen saturation targets (88-92%) used for chronic CO₂ retainers 1
  • They should receive standard oxygen therapy targeting 94-98% saturation 1
  • If they develop respiratory acidosis, they should be escalated to BiPAP rather than continuing with oxygen therapy alone 1

Monitoring and Reassessment

  • Closely monitor patients for the first 1-2 hours after initiating BiPAP
  • Check arterial blood gases at 1-2 hours after starting BiPAP
  • If PaCO₂ and pH have deteriorated after 1-2 hours on optimal settings, consider alternative management plan 1
  • If no improvement but no deterioration, continue BiPAP and reassess with repeat arterial blood gases after 4-6 hours 1

Important Caveats

  1. Location of Care:

    • Patients with type 2 respiratory failure who are not chronic retainers should be managed in an environment where immediate escalation to invasive ventilation is possible (HDU or ICU) 1
    • This is particularly important as they may deteriorate more rapidly than chronic CO₂ retainers who have developed compensatory mechanisms
  2. Contraindications to NIV:

    • Inability to protect airway
    • Severe agitation
    • Hemodynamic instability
    • Recent facial or upper airway surgery
  3. Failure of NIV:

    • If pH < 7.25 despite optimal BiPAP settings, consider early intubation 1
    • Non-chronic CO₂ retainers may have less tolerance for prolonged hypercapnia and acidosis

By following this approach, patients with type 2 respiratory failure who are not chronic CO₂ retainers will receive appropriate respiratory support that addresses their specific physiological needs while minimizing the risk of complications.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.