Hip T-Score Measurement in Patients with Bilateral Hip Replacement
In patients with bilateral hip replacements, hip T-scores cannot be measured and alternative skeletal sites such as the lumbar spine and forearm should be used for bone mineral density assessment.
Alternative Measurement Sites
When hip T-scores cannot be obtained due to bilateral hip replacements, the following alternative sites should be used:
Primary Alternative: Lumbar Spine
- The American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria rates DXA lumbar spine as "usually appropriate" (rating 9/9) for BMD screening and follow-up 1
- Patient positioning: supine with hips and knees flexed to 90° to reduce lumbar lordosis 1
- Measurement includes vertebrae L1-L4
- Caveat: Degenerative changes, compression fractures, or surgical implants may affect accuracy
Secondary Alternative: Forearm (Distal 1/3 Radius)
- Indicated when lumbar spine cannot be measured or interpreted 1
- ACR rates DXA distal forearm as "may be appropriate" (rating 5/9) for initial screening 1
- ACR rates DXA distal forearm as "usually appropriate" (rating 8/9) for certain populations including those where hip/spine cannot be measured 1
- Non-dominant arm should be measured
- Particularly useful when:
- Spine has significant degenerative changes
- Patient exceeds weight limit of scanner table
- Patient has hyperparathyroidism
Measurement Protocol
Lumbar spine measurement:
- Position patient supine with legs straight and feet uncrossed
- Flex hips and knees to 90° using positioning blocks
- Ensure spine is in neutral position with arms at sides
Forearm measurement:
- Use non-dominant arm
- Position forearm with radius and ulna parallel to short axis of scanning table
- Ensure no hardware, fusion, osteoarthritis, or fractures are present
Interpretation and Follow-up
- For diagnostic classification, use T-scores for postmenopausal women and men over 50 years; Z-scores for younger individuals 1
- The lowest T-score from available measurement sites should be used for diagnostic classification
- Follow-up BMD testing is recommended every 2-3 years to assess treatment efficacy 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not attempt to measure hip BMD through prosthetic components
- Metal implants create artifacts that invalidate measurements
Avoid using only one measurement site
- Using multiple sites (spine and forearm) provides more comprehensive assessment
Beware of overestimating bone density in lumbar spine
- Degenerative changes can artificially elevate BMD measurements
- Consider forearm measurements when spine shows significant arthritis
Ensure consistent positioning for follow-up scans
- Reproducible positioning is critical for accurate longitudinal assessment
Don't overlook Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)
- TBS of lumbar spine can provide additional fracture risk information
- ACR notes TBS "may be appropriate" (rating 4/9) as an adjunct to DXA 1
By following these guidelines, clinicians can effectively monitor bone health in patients with bilateral hip replacements despite the inability to obtain hip T-scores.