Initial Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma
The optimal initial treatment for multiple myeloma should include a triplet regimen based on a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, preferably bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd), or daratumumab combined with VRd (D-VRd) for high-risk patients. 1
Patient Stratification for Treatment Selection
Treatment selection depends on several key factors:
- Transplant eligibility (primarily based on age and comorbidities)
- Cytogenetic risk stratification
- Renal function
- Disease stage (using Durie-Salmon or International Staging System)
For Transplant-Eligible Patients (<65 years)
- Induction therapy: 3-4 cycles of VRd (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) 1
- Consolidation: High-dose melphalan (200 mg/m²) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) 2, 1
- Stem cell source: Peripheral blood progenitor cells rather than bone marrow 2
- Maintenance: Lenalidomide until progression for standard-risk patients; bortezomib plus lenalidomide for high-risk patients 1
For Transplant-Ineligible Patients (>65 years or with significant comorbidities)
- Standard-risk patients: VRd or daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) 1, 3
- High-risk patients: D-VRd (daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) 1
- Elderly/frail patients: Consider dose-adjusted regimens:
Evidence Supporting Treatment Recommendations
The MAIA trial demonstrated significant benefits of adding daratumumab to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) for transplant-ineligible patients, with:
- 44% reduction in risk of disease progression or death compared to Rd alone
- Median PFS of 61.9 months vs 34.4 months
- 32% reduction in risk of death
- Overall response rate of 92.9% vs 81.3% 3
For continuous therapy, the FIRST trial showed that continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared to fixed-duration therapy, supporting the recommendation for continuous therapy until progression 2.
Treatment Goals and Response Assessment
- Primary goal: Achievement of the best quality and depth of remission 2
- Response assessment: Using International Myeloma Working Group criteria after each cycle during induction and every 3 months once best response is achieved 2, 1
- Monitoring parameters: Serum/urine protein, free light chains, renal function, and calcium 1
Special Considerations
- Renal dysfunction: Bortezomib-based regimens do not require dose adjustment for renal impairment 2, 1
- Elderly patients: Consider bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone as an alternative regimen 1
- Asymptomatic/smoldering myeloma: Immediate treatment is not recommended 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying transplant evaluation in eligible patients
- Using fixed-duration therapy instead of continuous therapy when using novel agents
- Overlooking cytogenetic risk stratification which should guide treatment selection
- Failing to adjust doses for elderly or frail patients, which can lead to unnecessary toxicity and treatment discontinuation
- Not monitoring for common complications such as renal dysfunction, hypercalcemia, and bone disease
By following these evidence-based recommendations and tailoring treatment based on patient characteristics, the best outcomes in terms of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life can be achieved for patients with multiple myeloma.