Mortality Rates of Coronary Stent Procedures
The mortality rate of coronary stent procedures varies significantly based on patient risk factors and clinical presentation, with in-hospital mortality ranging from 0-3.7% for elective procedures to as high as 15.8% for emergency procedures, with drug-eluting stents showing similar mortality outcomes to bare-metal stents.
Mortality Rates by Procedure Type and Setting
Elective Procedures
- In-hospital mortality: 0-3.7% for elective stent procedures 1
- One-year mortality: 3.4% in low-risk patients (age <65 years, ejection fraction >30%) 1
- Cumulative survival rates for elective procedures:
- 92% at 6 months
- 88% at 1 year
- 86% at 3 years 2
Emergency/Urgent Procedures
- In-hospital mortality: 13.7-45.4% for high-risk or emergency cases 1, 2
- One-year survival rate: approximately 54% for emergency procedures 2
- Mortality rate of 5.4% (reduced to 2.1% when excluding patients with cardiogenic shock) 3
Mortality by Stent Type
Bare-Metal Stents (BMS)
- In-hospital mortality: 0-4.3% 1
- 6-12 month mortality: 2.5-10.8% 1
- Long-term follow-up (15 months): 2.15% combined rate of definite, probable, or possible stent thrombosis 4
Drug-Eluting Stents (DES)
- Similar overall mortality to BMS at 15 months follow-up 4
- Stent thrombosis rate: 1.80% (combined definite, probable, or possible) 4
- Definite stent thrombosis: 0.65% (similar to BMS at 0.61%) 4
- Higher risk of very late stent thrombosis (between 12-15 months) compared to BMS 4
Factors Affecting Mortality Risk
Hospital and Operator Volume
- Hospitals performing <400 procedures/year: 1.5% mortality for stent procedures
- Hospitals performing >400 procedures/year: 1.1% mortality 1
- Significant inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality rates 1
Patient-Specific Risk Factors
Factors significantly associated with increased mortality include:
- Advanced age
- Chronic renal insufficiency
- Presentation with myocardial infarction
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- History of cerebrovascular events
- Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction 5
Anatomical Considerations
- Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease:
Clinical Implications
Procedure Timing: For non-emergency cases, elective procedures carry significantly lower mortality risk than emergency procedures 2
Hospital Selection: Patients should be referred to high-volume centers (>400 procedures/year) when possible, as these centers demonstrate lower mortality rates 1
Risk Assessment: Careful evaluation of patient-specific factors is crucial, as mortality is strongly influenced by baseline clinical characteristics such as left ventricular function and comorbidities 1
Stent Selection: While DES and BMS show similar overall mortality rates, DES demonstrate lower rates of target vessel revascularization (43% reduction) 4
Pitfalls and Caveats
- Mortality statistics from older studies may not reflect current outcomes due to advances in stenting techniques and adjunctive pharmacotherapy 1
- In-hospital mortality figures may not capture late complications such as very late stent thrombosis, which occurs more frequently with DES 4
- Procedure-related mortality should be distinguished from mortality due to progression of underlying disease 5
- The relationship between volume and outcomes is statistical; some low-volume centers may achieve excellent results 1
When comparing coronary stenting to medical therapy alone, coronary bypass surgery (CABG) has shown a mortality benefit (OR=0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.97), while stenting has not demonstrated a significant mortality reduction compared to optimal medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease 6.