What is the clinical significance of a variation in blood pressure between arms?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Clinical Significance of Blood Pressure Variations Between Arms

Blood pressure should be checked in both arms at the first examination, as a between-arm systolic blood pressure difference of >10 mmHg is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and may indicate arterial obstruction. 1

Normal Variations and Their Causes

Blood pressure commonly varies between arms, with several studies documenting these differences:

  • 20% of individuals show differences of >10 mmHg between arms 1
  • These variations don't follow a consistent pattern related to handedness 1
  • The absolute differences at an individual level can be clinically significant, even when average relative differences between arms are not 2

Physiological causes of interarm differences:

  1. Anatomical variations in vascular structure
  2. Subclinical atherosclerosis affecting one arm more than the other
  3. Arterial stiffness differences between arms

Clinical Implications

Diagnostic Significance

Interarm blood pressure differences have important clinical implications:

  • Cardiovascular risk marker: A systolic BP difference >10 mmHg between arms is associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk 1
  • Potential indicator of arterial stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, or upper extremity arterial obstruction 1
  • Diagnostic errors: Failure to identify significant interarm differences can lead to erroneous clinical decisions 2

Measurement Recommendations

The American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology recommend:

  1. Measure BP in both arms at first visit 1, 3
  2. Use the arm with higher readings for subsequent measurements when a consistent difference >10 mmHg is found 1
  3. Special considerations:
    • In women who have had mastectomy, BP can be measured in both arms unless lymphedema is present 1
    • For patients with very large arms where standard cuffs don't fit, consider forearm measurement (though this may overestimate systolic BP) 1

Other Factors Affecting BP Measurement

Beyond interarm differences, several factors affect BP readings:

Body Position Effects

  • Diastolic BP is ~5 mmHg higher when sitting versus supine 1
  • Systolic BP is ~8 mmHg higher in supine versus upright position 1, 4
  • Unsupported back can increase diastolic BP by ~6 mmHg 1
  • Crossed legs can raise systolic BP by 2-8 mmHg 1

Arm Position Effects

  • Arm below heart level: falsely elevated readings (up to 10 mmHg) 1, 4, 5
  • Arm above heart level: falsely lowered readings 1
  • Each inch above/below heart level changes readings by ~2 mmHg 1
  • Arm held up by patient (versus supported): isometric exercise raises BP 1

Measurement Location

  • Wrist measurements typically overestimate arm BP by 8.2/9.2 mmHg 6, 7
  • Wrist-arm discrepancies vary by gender, age, and arm adiposity 6

Clinical Algorithm for BP Measurement

  1. First visit:

    • Measure BP in both arms simultaneously if possible 3
    • Use validated device with appropriate cuff size 3
    • Position patient properly (seated, back supported, legs uncrossed, arm at heart level) 1
  2. If interarm difference >10 mmHg systolic:

    • Document the finding
    • Use the arm with higher readings for all subsequent measurements 1
    • Consider further cardiovascular risk assessment
  3. If interarm difference ≤10 mmHg:

    • Either arm can be used for subsequent measurements
    • Maintain consistency in which arm is used for follow-up

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Failing to check both arms at initial evaluation
  2. Incorrect arm positioning relative to heart level
  3. Inappropriate cuff size leading to measurement errors
  4. Inconsistent measurement technique between visits
  5. Relying on wrist measurements without validation against upper arm readings
  6. Ignoring significant interarm differences that may indicate vascular disease

By understanding and accounting for these variations, clinicians can improve diagnostic accuracy and better assess cardiovascular risk in their patients.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.