What are Light's (Light's criteria) criteria used for in differentiating pleural effusions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Light's Criteria for Differentiating Pleural Effusions

Light's criteria are primarily used to differentiate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions, which is crucial for determining the underlying cause and guiding appropriate treatment of pleural effusions. 1

What Are Light's Criteria?

Light's criteria classify a pleural effusion as an exudate if any one of the following three parameters is met:

  1. Pleural fluid to serum protein ratio > 0.5
  2. Pleural fluid to serum LDH ratio > 0.6
  3. Pleural fluid LDH > 0.67 (or 2/3) of the upper limit of normal serum LDH value 1

If none of these criteria are met, the effusion is classified as a transudate.

Clinical Significance of the Classification

Transudative Effusions

  • Caused by systemic factors that alter the hydrostatic or oncotic pressures
  • Common causes: congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrotic syndrome
  • Management focuses on treating the underlying condition 1

Exudative Effusions

  • Result from local factors affecting the pleural surfaces or capillary permeability
  • Common causes: malignancy, infection (pneumonia, tuberculosis), pulmonary embolism, rheumatoid disease
  • Require more extensive diagnostic evaluation and specific treatment 1

Performance of Light's Criteria

  • Sensitivity: 98% for identifying exudates
  • Specificity: 72-80% for identifying exudates
  • Positive likelihood ratio: 3.5
  • Negative likelihood ratio: 0.03 1

Light's criteria were designed to maximize sensitivity for detecting exudates to avoid missing potentially serious conditions like malignancy or infection, which explains the relatively lower specificity.

Common Pitfalls and Limitations

  1. Misclassification of cardiac transudates: About 25-30% of transudates from heart failure or cirrhosis may be misclassified as exudates, especially in patients on diuretics 1

  2. Solution for misclassification: When Light's criteria suggest an exudate but clinical suspicion for heart failure is high:

    • Calculate the serum-albumin to pleural fluid albumin gradient
    • If gradient > 1.2 g/dL, the effusion is likely a transudate despite meeting Light's criteria 1
    • Alternatively, measure NT-proBNP in pleural fluid (>1500 μg/mL suggests heart failure) 1
  3. Analytical variability: Different laboratory platforms may cause up to 18% discordance in classification, primarily due to differences in LDH assay performance 2

  4. Need for both serum and pleural fluid samples: This can be inconvenient and increase costs

Alternative Approaches When Light's Criteria Cannot Be Fully Applied

  1. If serum samples are unavailable: Use pleural fluid LDH > 0.67 of upper limit of normal serum LDH and pleural fluid cholesterol > 55 mg/dL (in an "or" rule) 1, 3

  2. Abbreviated Light's criteria: Omitting the pleural fluid to serum LDH ratio still maintains good discriminative properties (sensitivity 95.4%, specificity 83.3%) 3

  3. Isolated pleural fluid LDH: In resource-limited settings, using just pleural fluid LDH > 200 IU/L can be a cost-effective approach with 95.6% accuracy 4

  4. Serum-effusion albumin gradient (SEAG): Particularly useful for identifying transudates misclassified by Light's criteria 5

Additional Pleural Fluid Parameters for Specific Diagnoses

After classifying the effusion, other parameters help identify specific causes:

  • pH < 7.2: Suggests pleural infection, rheumatoid arthritis, malignancy, or esophageal rupture 1
  • Glucose < 3.3 mmol/L: Seen in empyema, rheumatoid disease, tuberculosis, malignancy, or esophageal rupture 1
  • Elevated amylase: Indicates pancreatitis, esophageal rupture, or malignancy 1
  • Bloody appearance: Consider malignancy, pulmonary embolism, trauma, or post-cardiac injury syndrome 1

Clinical Approach to Pleural Effusions

  1. Perform thoracentesis and obtain both pleural fluid and serum samples
  2. Apply Light's criteria to differentiate between exudate and transudate
  3. If transudate: Direct therapy toward underlying condition (heart failure, cirrhosis, nephrosis)
  4. If exudate: Perform additional tests based on clinical suspicion:
    • Cytology for suspected malignancy
    • Gram stain, culture, pH, glucose for suspected infection
    • Adenosine deaminase for tuberculosis
    • Amylase for pancreatitis or esophageal rupture

Light's criteria remain the gold standard for differentiating pleural effusions despite their limitations, with excellent discriminative properties confirmed in a meta-analysis of 1,448 patients from eight studies 1.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.