Aortic Biological Prosthesis Valve Performance Parameters Measured by Echocardiography
The most important aortic biological prosthesis valve performance parameters measured by echocardiography include effective orifice area (EOA), peak and mean pressure gradients, Doppler velocity index (DVI), and assessment of regurgitation severity, which collectively provide critical information about valve function and hemodynamics.
Structural Assessment Parameters
Valve Structure and Motion:
- Visual assessment of leaflet thickness, calcification, mobility, and opening angle 1
- Identification of abnormal structures such as thrombus, pannus, or vegetation
- Normal biological valves should show thin, mobile leaflets with appropriate opening
Sewing Ring Position and Stability:
- Assessment for dehiscence, rocking, or abnormal motion of the prosthetic valve
- Rocking >40% of the sewing ring circumference suggests severe paravalvular regurgitation 1
Flow-Dependent Parameters
Velocity and Pressure Measurements
Peak Velocity (m/s):
- Measured using continuous wave (CW) Doppler
- Normal: <3 m/s
- Possible obstruction: 3-3.9 m/s
- Significant obstruction: ≥4 m/s 1
- Requires multiple acoustic windows to capture the highest velocity
Mean Pressure Gradient (mmHg):
- Calculated using the simplified Bernoulli equation (ΔP = 4V²)
- Normal: <20 mmHg
- Possible obstruction: 20-34 mmHg
- Significant obstruction: ≥35 mmHg 1
- Important caveat: In normally functioning bioprostheses with low velocities (<2 m/s), the simplified Bernoulli equation may overestimate gradients by 13-19% 1
Flow Acceleration Dynamics:
- Acceleration time (AT): Time from onset of flow to maximal velocity
- Normal: <80 ms
- Possible obstruction: 80-100 ms
- Significant obstruction: >100 ms 1
- AT/Ejection Time ratio:
- Normal: <0.32
- Possible obstruction: 0.32-0.37
- Significant obstruction: >0.37 1
- Flow envelope shape: Triangular with early peaking in normal valves; rounded and symmetrical in stenotic valves
- Acceleration time (AT): Time from onset of flow to maximal velocity
Flow-Independent Parameters
Effective Orifice Area (EOA) Measurements
EOA by Continuity Equation (cm²):
- Calculated as: Stroke Volume/VTI across prosthesis
- Formula: EOA = (LVOT area × LVOT VTI)/Prosthetic valve VTI 1
- Normal: >1.1 cm²
- Possible obstruction: 0.8-1.1 cm²
- Significant obstruction: <0.8 cm² 1
- Critical measurement pitfall: Accurate measurement of LVOT diameter is essential as errors are squared in the calculation 1
Indexed EOA (cm²/m²):
- EOA divided by body surface area
- Used to identify patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM)
- For BMI <30 kg/m²:
- No PPM: ≥0.85 cm²/m²
- Moderate PPM: 0.65-0.85 cm²/m²
- Severe PPM: <0.65 cm²/m² 1
Comparison to Reference Values:
- Measured EOA should be compared to normal reference values for specific valve type and size
- Difference between reference and measured EOA:
- Normal: <0.25 cm²
- Possible obstruction: 0.25-0.35 cm²
- Significant obstruction: >0.35 cm² 1
Doppler Velocity Index (DVI):
- Ratio of LVOT VTI to prosthetic valve VTI
- Normal: ≥0.35
- Possible obstruction: 0.25-0.34
- Significant obstruction: <0.25 1
- Advantage: Less dependent on flow conditions than pressure gradients
Regurgitation Assessment Parameters
Central Regurgitation
Color Flow Jet Width:
- Mild: Small jet
- Moderate: Intermediate jet
- Severe: Large jet (>65% of LVOT diameter) 1
CW Doppler Signal Intensity:
- Mild: Incomplete or faint signal
- Moderate/Severe: Dense signal 1
- Signal contour: Truncated with triangular contour suggests elevated pressure or severe regurgitation
Pressure Half-Time (PHT):
- Mild: >500 ms
- Moderate: 200-500 ms
- Severe: <200 ms 1
- Caution: Intermediate values (200-500 ms) are less specific as they are influenced by heart rate, LV compliance, and acuteness of regurgitation
Paravalvular Regurgitation
Circumferential Extent:
- Mild: <10% of sewing ring circumference
- Moderate: 10-29%
- Severe: ≥30% 1
Vena Contracta Width:
- Mild: <3 mm
- Moderate: 3-6 mm
- Severe: >6 mm 1
- Measured using color Doppler with Nyquist limit of 50-60 cm/s
Quantitative Parameters
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area (EROA):
- Mild: <10 mm²
- Moderate: 10-29 mm²
- Severe: ≥30 mm² 1
- Calculated using PISA method when feasible (more applicable to bioprostheses with central regurgitation)
Regurgitant Volume (RVol):
- Mild: <30 mL
- Moderate: 30-59 mL
- Severe: ≥60 mL 1
- Can be calculated as the difference between LVOT stroke volume and RV stroke volume (if no significant pulmonary regurgitation)
Regurgitant Fraction:
- Mild: <30%
- Moderate: 30-50%
- Severe: >50% 1
- Calculated as regurgitant volume divided by LVOT stroke volume
Downstream Flow Assessment
- Diastolic Flow Reversal in Descending Aorta:
- Mild: Brief, early diastolic reversal
- Moderate: Intermediate
- Severe: Holodiastolic flow reversal with end-diastolic velocity >20 cm/s 1
- Caution: Elderly patients with stiff aortas may show holodiastolic flow reversal with only mild AR
Serial Assessment Parameters
Change in Mean Gradient During Follow-up:
- Normal: <10 mmHg increase
- Possible obstruction: 10-19 mmHg increase
- Significant obstruction: ≥20 mmHg increase 1
Change in EOA During Follow-up:
- A decrease in EOA >25% suggests clinically significant obstruction 1
Practical Considerations and Pitfalls
Acoustic Shadowing: Prosthetic valve materials can create shadowing that impairs visualization of leaflets and flow patterns, particularly for paravalvular regurgitation assessment
Pressure Recovery Phenomenon: Doppler may overestimate gradients compared to catheter measurements, especially in patients with small aortas 1
LVOT Diameter Measurement: Critical for accurate EOA calculation; errors are squared in the continuity equation. Be careful not to mistake the inner border of the prosthesis stent/ring for the LVOT edge 1
Flow Dependence: Pressure gradients are highly flow-dependent; low-flow states may mask significant stenosis while high-flow states may exaggerate gradients in normal valves
Reference Values: EOA values must be compared to normal reference values for the specific prosthesis type and size, as there is significant variation between different valve models 1